2017
DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-4837-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving PM<sub>2. 5</sub> forecast over China by the joint adjustment of initial conditions and source emissions with an ensemble Kalman filter

Abstract: Abstract. In an attempt to improve the forecasting of atmospheric aerosols, the ensemble square root filter algorithm was extended to simultaneously optimize the chemical initial conditions (ICs) and emission input. The forecast model, which was expanded by combining the Weather Research and Forecasting with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model and a forecast model of emission scaling factors, generated both chemical concentration fields and emission scaling factors. The forecast model of emission scaling factors was de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
101
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when performing "top-down" emission adjustments, previous studies generally assimilate observations of only one or two species and adjust only the corresponding emission species. For example, Arellano et al (2006) and Yumimoto and Uno (2006) used carbon monoxide CO concentration observations to constrain the CO emissions, and Sekiyama et al (2010), Mao et al (2014), and Peng et al (2017) used aerosol observations to constrain the associated aerosol emissions. Similar strategies for constraining emissions can be found for nitrogen oxide (NO x ) emissions (Kurokawa et al, 2009) and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions (Vira & Sofiev, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when performing "top-down" emission adjustments, previous studies generally assimilate observations of only one or two species and adjust only the corresponding emission species. For example, Arellano et al (2006) and Yumimoto and Uno (2006) used carbon monoxide CO concentration observations to constrain the CO emissions, and Sekiyama et al (2010), Mao et al (2014), and Peng et al (2017) used aerosol observations to constrain the associated aerosol emissions. Similar strategies for constraining emissions can be found for nitrogen oxide (NO x ) emissions (Kurokawa et al, 2009) and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions (Vira & Sofiev, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penner et al, 2001;Bellouin et al, 2003;Liao and Seinfeld, 2005;Wu et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2015); however, large uncertainties remain. Forster et al (2007) noted that the global mean DRF varied from +0.04 to −0.63 W m −2 for total aerosols and from +0.1 to +0.3 W m −2 for BC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4D-LETKF was also implemented to assimilate MODIS Dark Target and Deep Blue AOTs to improve dust analyses and forecasts with assimilations at four time slots (every 6 hr) for a 24-hr assimilation window (Di Tomaso et al, 2017). In addition to the assimilation of routine satellite-based and ground-based AOTs, sparse surface or aircraft observations of aerosol mass concentrations, such as PM 2.5 and PM 10 , were also successfully assimilated to correct model simulations with variational or ensemble-based methods (Li et al, 2013;Pagowski et al, 2014;Pagowski & Grell, 2012;Peng et al, 2017;Zang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%