Improving provider practice patterns in ordering FDG PET/CT for breast cancer patients at a safety-net hospital.

Abstract

e14027 Background: Accurate staging is critical in determining treatment strategies in the management of breast cancer (BC) patients. FDG PET/CT is used to identify the presence of metastatic disease. The criteria for FDG PET/CT utilization is variable, including in any patient with nodal positivity, any patients with systemic symptoms, to those with Stage III disease or higher.. This practice variation has results in different patterns of ordering FDG PET/CT. The preliminary results of a Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) audit performed in our Cancer Center in 2017 prompted concern for the over utilization of FDG PET/CT in our BC patients. We performed an initial audit of these practices in 2017 and confirmed these findings. The goal of this study was to re-measure our adherence to NCCN guidelines in 2019 after an educational session complimented by use of a checklist. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for all BC patients who had FDG PET/CT ordered as initial treatment planning from 1/2017-12/2017. This revealed a 33% rate of failure to meet NCCN guidelines. We then educated our team about the NCCN guidelines for initial PET/CT ordering during our weekly multi-disciplinary conferences, created a test ordering checklist and compared the effect of this education on the use of PET/CT in patients treated at our institution from 1/2019-12/2019. Results: 65 female BC patients had an FDG PET/CT ordered to assist in initial treatment recommendation in 2017. Overall, 66.2% (n = 43) of patients met NCCN indications while 33.8% (n = 22) did not. In comparison to 2017 data, 71 female breast cancer patients had an FDG PET/CT ordered in 2019. Overall, 67 patients (94.4%) met NCCN criteria indications for undergoing FDG PET/CT while only 5 patients (5.6%) did not. Conclusions: Review of FDG PET/CT scans ordered for initial treatment in 2017 revealed that about one third of scans were ordered outside of NCCN guideline recommendations. After an educational session and implementation of a test ordering checklist, we found a marked reduction in the use of FDG PET/CT outside of NCCN guideline recommendations. Although our study is limited by small sample sizes, we identified a practice area that deviated from national recommendations and were able to improve our internal compliance in national guidelines through education and system modification.