2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03432-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving public cancer care by implementing precision medicine in Norway: IMPRESS-Norway

Abstract: Background Matching treatment based on tumour molecular characteristics has revolutionized the treatment of some cancers and has given hope to many patients. Although personalized cancer care is an old concept, renewed attention has arisen due to recent advancements in cancer diagnostics including access to high-throughput sequencing of tumour tissue. Targeted therapies interfering with cancer specific pathways have been developed and approved for subgroups of patients. These drugs might just a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is, even for CNS WHO grade 4 IDH ‐mutant astrocytomas, a rather aggressive clinical course with only half of the median survival time of IDH ‐mutant astrocytomas CNS WHO grade 4 and with tumor spread along the entire length of the spinal cord. Given the growing number of combined basket and umbrella studies, such as IMPRESS Norway, 13 in which patients are treated based on a molecular biological rationale, it appears reasonable to suggest that BRAF p.V600E‐targeted therapy is an attractive option for patients with gliomas bearing such a molecular alteration. In support of this view, drugs that specifically target cells expressing the BRAF p.V600E‐mutant protein, such as vemurafenib, have been documented to demonstrate a therapeutic effect in these gliomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, even for CNS WHO grade 4 IDH ‐mutant astrocytomas, a rather aggressive clinical course with only half of the median survival time of IDH ‐mutant astrocytomas CNS WHO grade 4 and with tumor spread along the entire length of the spinal cord. Given the growing number of combined basket and umbrella studies, such as IMPRESS Norway, 13 in which patients are treated based on a molecular biological rationale, it appears reasonable to suggest that BRAF p.V600E‐targeted therapy is an attractive option for patients with gliomas bearing such a molecular alteration. In support of this view, drugs that specifically target cells expressing the BRAF p.V600E‐mutant protein, such as vemurafenib, have been documented to demonstrate a therapeutic effect in these gliomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMB for OCAP was evaluated by Ion Reporter and TMB for TSO500 was evaluated by CLC Genomic Workbench and Illumina Local App using the default settings. The cut-offs for high TMB (>20 mut/Mb), intermediate (5–20 mut/Mb) and low TMB (<5 mut/Mb) were applied according to the protocol for IMPRESS-Norway [ 8 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials of new targeted drugs are commonly designed as basket or umbrella trials where patients are enrolled based on a wide selection of mutations [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. For example, an ongoing nation-wide Norwegian basket trial on precision medicine enrolls previously treated advanced cancer patients based on detection of a tumor mutation that can be targeted by the drugs available through the trial (currently 13 drugs, IMPRESS-Norway [ 8 ]). Additionally, patients with high TMB may receive immunotherapy through this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute characterization and tracking of this heterogeneity are key to successful interventions, predicting drug response, or even preventing relapse or resistance. The physician's ability to drive such quantitative predictions for the individual patient requires a clear understanding of emerging technologies and their mutual comparison, as validated through population-based assessments [2]. This review attempts to describe a framework for understanding emerging technologies (particularly in the last 2 years), that could better inform the clinician to influence disease intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%