23rd IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2002. RTSS 2002.
DOI: 10.1109/real.2002.1181565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving quality-of-control using flexible timing constraints: metric and scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In figure 4 and at t = 2s, instead of reserving half of the network bandwidth to subsystem 1, which is very close to the equilibrium, the adaptive scheduling algorithm uses these resources to achieve a quicker and better stabilization of subsystem 2. These results are is accordance with those of (Martí et al, 2002), where the empirical study of the relationship between resource allocation and control performance was undertaken. 6.…”
Section: A Numerical Examplesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In figure 4 and at t = 2s, instead of reserving half of the network bandwidth to subsystem 1, which is very close to the equilibrium, the adaptive scheduling algorithm uses these resources to achieve a quicker and better stabilization of subsystem 2. These results are is accordance with those of (Martí et al, 2002), where the empirical study of the relationship between resource allocation and control performance was undertaken. 6.…”
Section: A Numerical Examplesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In reality, as illustrated in [3], [4], the quality of control is also dependent on the dynamical state of the controlled system (in equilibrium, in transient state). In this paper, instead of using feedback from execution times measures, the plant state information is used to dispatch the available computing resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to the use of periodic sampling, which on the one hand simplifies the control design problem, but on the other hand leads to an unnecessary usage of some computational resources. In fact, a control task that is close to the equilibrium needs less computing resources than another one which is severely disturbed [3]- [5]. Similarly, the real-time scheduling design of control tasks is based on their worst-case execution time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FC-ORB is particularly useful for DRE applications that are amenable to rate adaptation such as digital feedback control systems (Marti et al, 2002;Seto et al, 1996), monitoring systems (Zhao et al, 2001), and multimedia (Brandt et al, 1998). In these systems, task rates can be adjusted without causing system failure.…”
Section: A U T H O R ' S P E R S O N a L C O P Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the rate of a task T i may be dynamically adjusted within a range [R min,i , R max,i ]. This assumption is based on the fact that the task rates in many DRE applications (e.g., digital control (Marti et al, 2002;Seto et al, 1996), sensor update, and multimedia (Brandt et al, 1998)) can be dynamically adjusted without causing system failure. A task running 1 FC-ORB can be extended to support a more general task model in which a task is composed of a graph of subtasks (Liu, 2000 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%