2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5050764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving radiation efficiency using metasurface in pyramidal horn antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 shows the simulated and measured co-polarisation and cross-polarisation (X-polarisation) in E-plane at 2.4, 2.8 and 3.2 GHz. The SLL start increasing after 2.8 GHz which can be reduced by using metasurface as shown by Baghel and Nayak [17]. Similarly, Fig.…”
Section: Simulation and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14 shows the simulated and measured co-polarisation and cross-polarisation (X-polarisation) in E-plane at 2.4, 2.8 and 3.2 GHz. The SLL start increasing after 2.8 GHz which can be reduced by using metasurface as shown by Baghel and Nayak [17]. Similarly, Fig.…”
Section: Simulation and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In the case of PPHA, the amplitude of E y (x, y) takes a dip and a valley is observed which is the reason for the increase in the SLL in the E-plane because of no tapering amplitude distribution in E-plane. The SLL can be brought down by having the tapering amplitude variation in Eplane which is done by the authors in the case of TPHA as shown in [17] by using metasurface. Similarly, the difference between SD of phase variation in PPHA and TPHA is 26.82° in E y (x, y = 0) and 15.97° in E y (x = 0, y) where PPHA gives less phase variations in both the planes at the aperture.…”
Section: Pc Stabilisation Phase and Amplitude Variation Across The Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The side lobe level (SLL) particularly in E‐plane increases at higher frequency as frequency is near to the cut‐off frequency of the second dominant mode (3.48 GHz). The SLL in E‐plane is reduced (doted line in Figure 3(C)) by placing metasurface (MS) inside the APPHA at an optimized distance (in this case 384.55 mm from aperture) which reduces the phase‐error further as shown in TPHA case in 17 …”
Section: Comparison Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The SLL in E-plane is reduced (doted line in Figure 3(C)) by placing metasurface (MS) inside the APPHA at an optimized distance (in this case 384.55 mm from aperture) which reduces the phaseerror further as shown in TPHA case in. 17 The gain and jS 11 j are plotted in Figure 3(E),(F), respectively. The maximum gain of 20.7 dBi is achieved at 2.7 GHz and decreases due to the increase in SLL level at the higher frequencies.…”
Section: Comparison Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%