2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) growth by treatment with a fish (Paralichthys olivaceus) myostatin prodomain expressed in soluble forms in E. coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was observed that MSTN b was hardly detected before hatching, and MSTN a was detected as early as 2 hpf, with two peaks at 4 hpf and 24 hpf, respectively, which suggested that at least two genes were controlled by different transregulatory factors, and they may ultimately had evolved different physiological roles. Some studies had speculated that in teleost MSTN a appeared to primarily inhibit muscle hyperplasia rather than hypertrophy, and that growth through muscle hypertrophy was only attained when the MSTN b expression was down-regulated (Lee et al, 2010;McPherron et al, 1997). There was no direct evidence to confirm whether MSTN a was inhibited or hypertrophied, but at least, we found that MSTN a was correlated with somitogenesis, while MSTN b was not in M. amblycephala.…”
Section: Genescontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…However, it was observed that MSTN b was hardly detected before hatching, and MSTN a was detected as early as 2 hpf, with two peaks at 4 hpf and 24 hpf, respectively, which suggested that at least two genes were controlled by different transregulatory factors, and they may ultimately had evolved different physiological roles. Some studies had speculated that in teleost MSTN a appeared to primarily inhibit muscle hyperplasia rather than hypertrophy, and that growth through muscle hypertrophy was only attained when the MSTN b expression was down-regulated (Lee et al, 2010;McPherron et al, 1997). There was no direct evidence to confirm whether MSTN a was inhibited or hypertrophied, but at least, we found that MSTN a was correlated with somitogenesis, while MSTN b was not in M. amblycephala.…”
Section: Genescontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…An increase in mass has been reported for fish species capable of indeterminate growth (i.e. non-growth limited) following injection or submersion in a bath of a soluble form of the Acvr2b (Carpio et al, 2009) or myostatin pro-domain (Lee et al, 2010a); however, this research was limited to only larval and early juvenile life stages. In the research presented here, transgenic trout overexpressing a truncated acvr2b-2a (acvr2b ∆ ) were produced to investigate the involvement of Acvr2b signaling in the long-term regulation of muscle mass in a teleost species with indeterminate growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in fiber number was observed in transgenic zebrafish over expressing Mstn1Pro (Xu et al, 2003). An improved growth of rainbow trout was observed by treatment with flatfish (Paralichthys olivaceus) Mstn1Pro expressed an E. coli system (Lee et al, 2010), indicating the potential of fish Mstn1Pro as an agent to improve the growth of commercially important aquaculture species. It is, therefore, desirable to develop a method for economic production of large quantity of fish Mstn1Pro.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…An earlier study reported an insoluble expression of seabream Mstn1Pro in an E. coli system, thus a series of time-consuming refolding procedures were performed to obtain bioactive soluble Mstn1Pro (Funkenstein and Rebhan, 2007). Recently, however, bioactive fish Mstn1Pro proteins were expressed in soluble forms in an E. coli system using Maltose Binding Protein (MBP) as a fusion partner (Lee et al, 2010;2011), suggesting that MBP may serve as an useful fusion partner to induce soluble expression of MstnPro proteins of various species. However, the yield of purified protein was too low (about 700 µg L −1 culture) to realize the benefit of large production capacity of the E. coli expression system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%