2012
DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2011.600534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving reading achievements of struggling learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a gap remains between research findings and educational practice ( Van Keer and Verhaeghe, 2005 ; Liang and Dole, 2006 ; Andreassen and Bråten, 2011 ). That is, instructional methods and materials to teach reading comprehension often are insufficient and the empirical support for the taught reading strategies’ effectiveness is equivocal ( Droop et al, 2012 ; Houtveen and van de Grift, 2012 ; Stoeldraijer and Forrer, 2012 ). In particular, it has been suggested that instructional methods have not been sufficiently grounded in relevant reading comprehension literature focusing on the different levels of mental text representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a gap remains between research findings and educational practice ( Van Keer and Verhaeghe, 2005 ; Liang and Dole, 2006 ; Andreassen and Bråten, 2011 ). That is, instructional methods and materials to teach reading comprehension often are insufficient and the empirical support for the taught reading strategies’ effectiveness is equivocal ( Droop et al, 2012 ; Houtveen and van de Grift, 2012 ; Stoeldraijer and Forrer, 2012 ). In particular, it has been suggested that instructional methods have not been sufficiently grounded in relevant reading comprehension literature focusing on the different levels of mental text representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a gap remains between empirical findings and actual instruction (Aarnoutse & Weterings, 1995;Andreassen & Bråten, 2011;Liang & Dole, 2006;van Keer & Verhaeghe, 2005). That is, curricular textbooks for reading comprehension are often inadequate, and the effectiveness of the included reading strategies is not always supported by empirical evidence (Droop, van Elsäcker, Voeten, & Verhoeven, 2012;Houtveen & van de Grift, 2012;Stoeldraijer & Forrer, 2012). Moreover, relatively little teaching time is spent on reading comprehension in Dutch primary schools, with even less time devoted to explicit instruction (Houtveen & van de Grift, 2007;Periodic Survey of Educational Level, 2013;van Elsäcker, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the sole multitier 1, 2 and 3 study, Houtveen and van de Grift () implemented a self‐devised Reading Acceleration Programme over a 3‐year period in 21 schools in the Netherlands. The teachers who delivered the intervention were ‘trained to improve their core instruction, to broaden their instruction for struggling learners, and to implement special measures for pupils who do not respond sufficiently to these interventions’ (p. 71).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…movement of children between tiers or changes in intensity of instruction at different tiers), and the reading programmes used were of secondary interest (e.g. Houtveen & van de Grift, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%