2010
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving reading comprehension of at‐risk high‐school students: The ART of reading program

Abstract: Participants (115 low-socioeconomic-status [SES], inner-city, high-school students) were exposed to three reading conditions: (1) a control condition in which students silently read brief selected passages; (2) an experimental condition in which students were prompted to perform a three-part (Ask, Read, and Tell [ART]) comprehension enhancement exercise before, during, and after reading the selected passages; and (3) another experimental condition in which ART was followed by peer discussion (PD) of the readin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-management and specifically self-monitoring strategies have been used to increase a variety of desirable behaviors in secondary schools such as: productivity rate, study behaviors, correct punctuation, attention given to appropriate behavior, and treatment integrity (Alfassi, 1998; Jitendra, Cole, Hoppes, & Wilson, 1998); improved accuracy, and work completion (Shimabukuro, Prater, Jenkins, & Edelen-Smith, 1999); and reading comprehension and writing (Alfassi, 1998; McCallum et al, 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self-management and specifically self-monitoring strategies have been used to increase a variety of desirable behaviors in secondary schools such as: productivity rate, study behaviors, correct punctuation, attention given to appropriate behavior, and treatment integrity (Alfassi, 1998; Jitendra, Cole, Hoppes, & Wilson, 1998); improved accuracy, and work completion (Shimabukuro, Prater, Jenkins, & Edelen-Smith, 1999); and reading comprehension and writing (Alfassi, 1998; McCallum et al, 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used with positive results alone and in combination with other behavioral interventions (e.g., Blick & Test, 1987; McCallum et al, 2011; Crabtree et al, 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Scammacca et al (2015), over the past decade only five studies of high school struggling readers have been conducted in the United States (Harris, Schumaker, & Deshler, 2011;Lang et al, 2009;McCallum et al, 2011;Penney, 2002;Wexler, Vaughn, Roberts, & Denton, 2010). All but one of these studies provided fewer than 25 hr of intervention instruction (Harris et al, 2011;McCallum et al, 2011;Penney, 2002;Wexler et al, 2010) and focused on single components of reading instruction such as word study (Penney, 2002), fluency , vocabulary (Harris et al, 2011), or comprehension (McCallum et al, 2011. Only Lang et al (2009) provided a multicomponent intervention for 90 min per day over a 9-month period and found no statistically significant differences in reading comprehension between struggling readers in the treatment and comparison conditions.…”
Section: Intensive Reading Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, integrating vocabulary and comprehension strategies with peer collaboration and discussion activities has led to improved student outcomes in reading as well as content learning (McCallum et al, 2011;Morocco, Hindin, Mata-Aguilar, & Clark-Chiarelli, 2001;Wexler, Reed, Pyle, Mitchell, & Barton, 2013). However, using peer-mediated activities as a replacement for having students actively read text for themselves has not proven effective (Cuevas et al, 2012).…”
Section: Elements Of Effective Instructional Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%