2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving regulations on residential emissions and non-criteria hazardous contaminants—Insights from a field campaign on ambient PM and PAHs in North China Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is attributed to the clean heating campaign launched in 2016/2017 in this area, which was also known as coal-to-gas/electricity or the coal ban policy [ 34 , 35 ]. Studies have shown that the policy resulted in large reductions in air pollutant emissions and significant health benefits [ 35 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is attributed to the clean heating campaign launched in 2016/2017 in this area, which was also known as coal-to-gas/electricity or the coal ban policy [ 34 , 35 ]. Studies have shown that the policy resulted in large reductions in air pollutant emissions and significant health benefits [ 35 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have long been concerned with the status of soil PAC pollution yielded by coking plant emissions, with attention paid to the limited 16 priority control polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (referred to as priority PAHs hereafter), as proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance in the 1970s. However, with the advancement of monitoring techniques, the characteristics of non-priority PAHs have continued to receive attention, mainly due to the high toxicity of certain non-priority PAHs, such as Benzo(e)pyrene, Dibenzo(a,e)fluoranthene, Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene, and 6-nitrochrysene [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. A study has indicated that when considering only priority PAHs, the respiratory exposure risk achieved over Nanjing City, China, is 5.6 × 10 −5 , but it significantly increases to 4.4 × 10 −4 when non-priority PAHs are considered [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high BaP concentration in particle matter could pose a health risk to public health and exhibit ecological toxicological effects on the ecosystem [9,10]. It is estimated that the inhalation of particulate BaP ranging from 1.1 to 14.3 ng m −3 could lead to an incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) as high as 3.1 × 10 −5 , greater than the recommended safe level (10 −6 ) [8]. The ecological remediation strategy is recommended as a cheap and sustainable environmental protection tool for mitigating PAHs with high toxicity in the ambient environment [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emissions of PAHs in China account for ~20% of the total PAH emissions globally [ 6 ]. In North China, mean levels of particulate BaP (a representative PAH) vary from 1.1 to 14.3 ng m −3 annually, which is higher than the recommended threshold value of 1.0 ng m −3 by the WHO [ 7 , 8 ]. The high BaP concentration in particle matter could pose a health risk to public health and exhibit ecological toxicological effects on the ecosystem [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%