2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7747-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving root cause analysis through the integration of PLM systems with cross supply chain maintenance data

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a system architecture for integrating Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems with cross supply chain maintenance information to support root-cause analysis. By integrating product-data from PLM systems with warranty claims, vehicle diagnostics and technical publications, engineers were able to improve the root-cause analysis and close the information gaps. Data collection was achieved via in-depth semi-structured interviews and workshops with exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of Madenas et al (2016) is to demonstrate a system architecture for integrating product lifecycle management (PLM) systems with cross-supply chain maintenance information to support root cause analysis. By integrating product data from PLM systems with warranty claims, vehicle diagnostics, and technical publications, engineers were able to improve the root cause analysis and close the information gaps (Madenas et al, 2016). The contribution of Behnake and Janssen ( 2020) is to identify boundary conditions for sharing assurance information to improve traceability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contribution of Madenas et al (2016) is to demonstrate a system architecture for integrating product lifecycle management (PLM) systems with cross-supply chain maintenance information to support root cause analysis. By integrating product data from PLM systems with warranty claims, vehicle diagnostics, and technical publications, engineers were able to improve the root cause analysis and close the information gaps (Madenas et al, 2016). The contribution of Behnake and Janssen ( 2020) is to identify boundary conditions for sharing assurance information to improve traceability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on an extensive content analysis of academic and trade literature, including websites and documents of vendors and users of the technologies, Musa et al (2014) capture, analyze, compare, and contrast the design choices, essence, results, and current and potential future impacts of some recent developments. The contribution of Madenas et al (2016) is to demonstrate a system architecture for integrating product lifecycle management (PLM) systems with cross-supply chain maintenance information to support root cause analysis. By integrating product data from PLM systems with warranty claims, vehicle diagnostics, and technical publications, engineers were able to improve the root cause analysis and close the information gaps (Madenas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reusing, modifying, translating product data generated through CAD/CAM/CAE platforms by using neutral formats such as STEP/XML has already been explored and would be beneficial for practitioners seeking application of this (Chiang and Trappey, 2007; Nosenzo et al , 2014). Integration of PLM with other enterprise-level systems is also important to consider since there are multiple applications in an organization working towards overall organizational benefit (Ming et al , 2008, Demoly et al , 2013, Wiesner et al , 2015; Lv et al , 2016; Madenas et al , 2016; Sodhro et al , 2018). The integration efforts extended to requirement management have also been expanded to identify with existing RM techniques (Daniels et al , 2013; Violante et al , 2008) and provided a PLM based approach for the same purpose is established through PLM, leading to the inclusion of this domain within PLM (Violante and Vezzetti, 2014; Papinniemi et al ., 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to understand that the complete spectrum of manufacturing could not be completed without involving the activities at the supplier ends. Thus, the involvement of suppliers has been investigated in a PLM integrated system (Madenas et al , 2016). The next phase, which is addressed by PLM research, is an important domain of product service-related activities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Goh [14] emphasised the importance of feeding back manufacturing knowledge to improve the design and engineering capability in the aerospace industry, yet the work envisaged an organisational strategy toward improving the knowledge feedback cycle with less emphasis on how organising and structuring data can further enable a higher impact of such strategies. Madenas et al [15] recognised the benefits of analysing data held at the supplier's knowledge base, and the way to identify and integrate it within PLM systems for the purpose of root cause identification. Chaime [16] recognised the effects of defects on quality management from made (in-house) and supplied parts.…”
Section: Overview Of Previous Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%