2014
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201402634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Site‐Directed RNA Editing In Vitro and in Cell Culture by Chemical Modification of the GuideRNA

Abstract: Adenosine-to-inosine deamination can be re-addressed to user-defined mRNAs by applying phosphothioate/2'-methoxy-modified guideRNAs. Dense chemical modification of the guideRNA clearly improves performance of the covalent conjugates inside the living cell. Furthermore, careful positioning of a few modifications controls editing selectivity in vitro and was exploited for the challenging repair of the Factor 5 Leiden missense mutation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hADAR1 deaminase domain and guide RNA were assembled by a rapid and specific single covalent bond between the SNAP-tag and BG moiety (Figure 1). After the guide RNA-deaminase conjugate was generated, it rapidly carried out site-directed specific RNA editing of the target mRNA, and the results showed the subsequent repair of a premature stop codon (UAG) into a tryptophan codon (UIG) in a fluorescent reporter gene, both in vitro and in human cells (293T) (69). Recently, the BG moiety was chemically masked using a light-sensitive 6-nitropiperonyloxymethyl (Npom) protection group, resulting in Npom-protected O6-benzylguanine (Npom-BG).…”
Section: Enzymatic Site-directed A-to-i Rna Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hADAR1 deaminase domain and guide RNA were assembled by a rapid and specific single covalent bond between the SNAP-tag and BG moiety (Figure 1). After the guide RNA-deaminase conjugate was generated, it rapidly carried out site-directed specific RNA editing of the target mRNA, and the results showed the subsequent repair of a premature stop codon (UAG) into a tryptophan codon (UIG) in a fluorescent reporter gene, both in vitro and in human cells (293T) (69). Recently, the BG moiety was chemically masked using a light-sensitive 6-nitropiperonyloxymethyl (Npom) protection group, resulting in Npom-protected O6-benzylguanine (Npom-BG).…”
Section: Enzymatic Site-directed A-to-i Rna Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, a guideRNA-dependent deaminase was constructed by engineering protein-guided human ADAR1 (hADAR1) into a guideRNA-dependent enzyme; the C-terminal catalytic domain of hADAR1 was fused to a SNAP-tag of the guideR-NA-dependent enzyme. The recombinant enzyme effectively and selectively repaired the stop66 nonsense mutation (UAG) to a functional tryptophan (UGG) (20). In another study, a recombinant site-directed editase was generated by removing the endogenous targeting domains of protein-guided hADAR2 and replacing them with an antisense RNA oligonucleotide; these enzymes were successfully used for directed, specific editing of the W496X mutation in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, the deaminase domain of human ADAR has been linked to a guide-RNA via either a SNAP-tag strategy or λN-boxB interaction (39,44–46). These methods depend on Watson and Crick base paring for target recognition and binding, in addition to the requirements for the delivery of chemically modified guide-RNA (for SNAP-tag) to living cells (46–48). Our dCas13a-hADAR2d system provides an attractive alternative for RNA editing applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P5-125 (PspCas13b), to mediate RNA editing in human cell lines has also been reported (38). With an improved hyperactive hADAR2d variant (E488Q), the efficiency of editing using the PspCas13b/hADAR2d(E488Q) system is comparable to or better than that of the guide-RNA approaches discussed above (43,46–48). The performance of our dCas13a-hADAR2d system in S. pombe varied for different targets, with an RNA editing efficiency of up to 54.5% being achieved for tdh1 (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%