Improving Strontium Removal from Solution by Controlled Reflux Foam Separation

Schonfeld, E.; Kibbey, A.H.

doi:10.13182/nt67-a27857

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Recently Reported Adsubble Separations1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1968

1973

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Book3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 13 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a combined column with external reflux, a strontium decontamination factor (defined as CF/CW) in excess of 1000 was obtained with a volume reduction (F/D) of 3700 for a feed rate of 40 gal/hr per ft2 of column cross section in a 3.8 cm i.d. column (125). This performance was considerably better than that obtained without the external reflux.…”

Section: Recently Reported Adsubble Separationsmentioning

confidence: 67%

ADSORPTIVE BUBBLE SEPARATION METHODS—Foam Fractionation and Allied Techniques

Lemlich¹

1968

Ind. Eng. Chem.

178

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Recently Reported Adsubble Separationsmentioning

confidence: 67%

ADSORPTIVE BUBBLE SEPARATION METHODS—Foam Fractionation and Allied Techniques

Lemlich¹

1968

Ind. Eng. Chem.

178

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Removal of Trace Metals by Foam Separation Processes

Rubin¹

1968

Journal AWWA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes research on the use of foam separation processes for removing metal ions from water. Whether the removal process is a foam fractionation, precipitate flotation, or ion flotation depends primarily on the nature of the metal‐collector product, the sublate. Factors affecting the solubility of the sublate, and therefore the mechanism, include the coordination behavior of the metal toward the collector surfactant, the nature of the collector, and the pH of the solution. Other variables that may significantly affect the removal process include the rate of gas flow, the concentrations of metal and collector, and the ionic strength of the solution.

show abstract

Applications. Separation by Foam

Bikerman¹

1973

Foams

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Improving Strontium Removal from Solution by Controlled Reflux Foam Separation

Cited by 13 publications

References 5 publications

ADSORPTIVE BUBBLE SEPARATION METHODS—Foam Fractionation and Allied Techniques

ADSORPTIVE BUBBLE SEPARATION METHODS—Foam Fractionation and Allied Techniques

Removal of Trace Metals by Foam Separation Processes

Applications. Separation by Foam

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About