Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques

Abstract

Many students are being left behind by an educational system that some people believe is in crisis. Improving educational outcomes will require efforts on many fronts, but a central premise of this monograph is that one part of a solution involves helping students to better regulate their learning through the use of effective learning techniques. Fortunately, cognitive and educational psychologists have been developing and evaluating easy-to-use learning techniques that could help students achieve their learning goals. In this monograph, we discuss 10 learning techniques in detail and offer recommendations about their relative utility. We selected techniques that were expected to be relatively easy to use and hence could be adopted by many students. Also, some techniques (e.g., highlighting and rereading) were selected because students report relying heavily on them, which makes it especially important to examine how well they work. The techniques include elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, summarization, highlighting (or underlining), the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, rereading, practice testing, distributed practice, and interleaved practice. To offer recommendations about the relative utility of these techniques, we evaluated whether their benefits generalize across four categories of variables: learning conditions, student characteristics, materials, and criterion tasks. Learning conditions include aspects of the learning environment in which the technique is implemented, such as whether a student studies alone or with a group. Student characteristics include variables such as age, ability, and level of prior knowledge. Materials vary from simple concepts to mathematical problems to complicated science texts. Criterion tasks include different outcome measures that are relevant to student achievement, such as those tapping memory, problem solving, and comprehension. We attempted to provide thorough reviews for each technique, so this monograph is rather lengthy. However, we also wrote the monograph in a modular fashion, so it is easy to use. In particular, each review is divided into the following sections: General description of the technique and why it should work How general are the effects of this technique? 2a. Learning conditions 2b. Student characteristics 2c. Materials 2d. Criterion tasks Effects in representative educational contexts Issues for implementation Overall assessment The review for each technique can be read independently of the others, and particular variables of interest can be easily compared across techniques. To foreshadow our final recommendations, the techniques vary widely with respect to their generalizability and promise for improving student learning. Practice testing and distributed practice received high utility assessments because they benefit learners of different ages and abilities and have been shown to boost students' performance across many criterion tasks and even in educational contexts. Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, and in...

The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016).

“…Assertions such as "all that matters is whether the child reads better" appear to treat the understanding of underlying processes as irrelevant. This unhelpful view of pedagogy runs counter to decades of research applying the findings of cognitive, developmental, and educational psychology to promote the learning of academic knowledge and skills (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999;Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan, & Willingham, 2013).…”

The benefit of retrieval practice over elaborative restudy in primary school vocabulary learning

“…It is therefore important to investigate whether strategies exist that can effectively augment vocabulary learning. Fundamental cognitive psychological research points at possible candidate strategies, but for many of these strategies the question is whether they generalize to classroom practice (Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan, & Willingham, 2013). In this article, we will investigate one strategy that holds considerable promise for classroom application, namely learning.…”

El apoyo al estudio independiente en un curso de comprensión de lectura con “Hot Potatoes”

“…Las respuestas emitidas en la pregunta cinco del instrumento de valoración evidencian la validez y utilidad de las pruebas de práctica como estrategia de estudio (Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan, y Willingham, 2013), ya que son de gran utilidad al estudiante al comprender el planteamiento de ciertos ejercicios y poder reforzar individualmente aquellos conceptos que no le han quedado claros. Esto, en la opinión del autor de este artículo, constituye un tipo de práctica más real e incluso más justa.…”