2012
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201202194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Surface Plasmon Detection in Gold Nanostructures Using a Multi‐Polarization Spectral Integration Method

Abstract: A multi‐polarization spectral integration method to increase the refractive index detection limit of gold nanostructures is presented. For a dual‐period nanogrid structure, the proposed method increased signal‐to‐noise ratio and refractive index detection limit about 8 times larger than the simple intensity method. The nanogrid achieves a detection limit of 1.92 × 10−6 refractive index unit when the intensity stability is 0.2%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of the fitting curve shows that the intensity sensitivity was 29,345%/RIU. The measured intensity sensitivity is much better than the reported intensity sensitivities of gold nanoslit, nanohole or nanogrid arrays ~1,010–12,963%/RIU273940 and ATR-based SPR sensors ~ 15,000%/RIU2. For the current system, the integration time for acquiring one spectrum was 25 milliseconds and the intensity noise was 0.7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The slope of the fitting curve shows that the intensity sensitivity was 29,345%/RIU. The measured intensity sensitivity is much better than the reported intensity sensitivities of gold nanoslit, nanohole or nanogrid arrays ~1,010–12,963%/RIU273940 and ATR-based SPR sensors ~ 15,000%/RIU2. For the current system, the integration time for acquiring one spectrum was 25 milliseconds and the intensity noise was 0.7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The slope of the fitting curve shows that the intensity sensitivity was 29,345%/RIU. This measured intensity sensitivity is much higher than the reported intensity sensitivities of gold nanoslit, nanohole or nanogrid arrays: ~1000%/RIU–10,000%/RIU [ 18 , 22 , 38 ], and prism-based SPR sensors: ~15,000%/RIU [ 2 ]. In our measurement, using a simple while-light source and a cheap USB-based mini-spectrometer, the intensity noise was 0.7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The biolayer sensitivity is determined by wavelength sensitivity, evanescent length, and refractive index difference between the adsorbate monolayer and surrounding environment, and the intensity sensitivity. To improve the sensing capability of SPR sensors, many methods have been proposed, such as spectral integration analysis [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], thermal-annealing nanoimprint method [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], Fano coupling method [ 23 , 24 , 25 ], narrowing resonance bandwidth with oblique angle incidence [ 26 ], two-mode coupling between top and substrate resonances [ 27 ], oblique-angle-induced Fano resonances [ 13 ], and nearly guided wave SPR sensors [ 28 ]. Among these approaches, the Fano resonance is frequently utilized to increase the intensity sensitivity in metallic nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability results in a strong enhancement of local electric fields, which is extremely useful for sensing [2][3][4][5][6][7], enhanced optical nonlinearity [8,9], plasmonic laser [10], and light harvesting [11]. Commercially available surface plasmon refractive index (RI) sensors are so far dominated by those based on propagating surface plasmon resonance (PSPR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%