2018
DOI: 10.7249/rr2242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Teaching Effectiveness: Final Report: The Intensive Partnerships for Effective Teaching Through 2015–2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, other research findings indicate that a greater emphasis on student achievement and an increased number of required observations has not improved teaching and learning in the United States (Stecher et al, 2018). Perhaps this is because even under the best conditions when principals were prepared and had the skills to do teacher evaluation well, they lacked time (Donaldson & Woulfin, 2018;Goldring et al, 2015;Kraft & Gilmour, 2016;Lavigne & Chamberlain, 2017;Stecher et al, 2018) 2 . Principals coped by completing fewer observations than designated by policy or cutting observations short, and were unavailable to address teacher concerns (Donaldson & Woulfin, 2018;Stecher et al, 2018).…”
Section: Teacher Evaluation: Policy and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, other research findings indicate that a greater emphasis on student achievement and an increased number of required observations has not improved teaching and learning in the United States (Stecher et al, 2018). Perhaps this is because even under the best conditions when principals were prepared and had the skills to do teacher evaluation well, they lacked time (Donaldson & Woulfin, 2018;Goldring et al, 2015;Kraft & Gilmour, 2016;Lavigne & Chamberlain, 2017;Stecher et al, 2018) 2 . Principals coped by completing fewer observations than designated by policy or cutting observations short, and were unavailable to address teacher concerns (Donaldson & Woulfin, 2018;Stecher et al, 2018).…”
Section: Teacher Evaluation: Policy and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps this is because even under the best conditions when principals were prepared and had the skills to do teacher evaluation well, they lacked time (Donaldson & Woulfin, 2018;Goldring et al, 2015;Kraft & Gilmour, 2016;Lavigne & Chamberlain, 2017;Stecher et al, 2018) 2 . Principals coped by completing fewer observations than designated by policy or cutting observations short, and were unavailable to address teacher concerns (Donaldson & Woulfin, 2018;Stecher et al, 2018). Principals spent more time writing their evaluations than observing teachers and providing teachers with rich feedback (Flores & Derrington, 2017).…”
Section: Teacher Evaluation: Policy and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our second step involved collecting and examining the prior research that led to the design of the two initiatives. We found the empirical evidence in program evaluation reports conducted by independent evaluators at the American Institutes for Research (Berger et al, 2013;Stecher et al, 2018). The data sources included the two program evaluation reports and the research studies cited within each report.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although P4P contracts based on a composite metric of teacher inputs and student performance have been used in a number of policy settings in the US (Im-berman, 2015;Stecher et al, 2018), such contracts have been relatively less studied in low-and middle-income countries. In their comprehensive review, Glewwe and Muralidharan (2016) discuss several evaluations of teacher incentives based on student test scores or attendance checks, but none based on a combination of both.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%