2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1286-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Accuracy of Collaborative Filtering-Based Recommendations by Considering the Temporal Variance of Top-N Neighbors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommended list should be composed of items not evaluated by the active user and sorted in decreasing order of predicted rating values. An RS that offers a few better items with higher prediction ratings is known as the 'Top-N' Recommender system (Singh et al, 2020). • fuzzy real-coded genetic algorithm (Fuzzy-RCGA)…”
Section: Gupta and Kant (2020a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended list should be composed of items not evaluated by the active user and sorted in decreasing order of predicted rating values. An RS that offers a few better items with higher prediction ratings is known as the 'Top-N' Recommender system (Singh et al, 2020). • fuzzy real-coded genetic algorithm (Fuzzy-RCGA)…”
Section: Gupta and Kant (2020a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that the MovieLens dataset contains only the ratings of the authentic users. This dataset consists of 943 users, 1682 movies, and 1,00,000 ratings [25][26][27]. These ratings are integer values between 1 and 5, where 1 denotes the lowest rating and 5 denotes the highest rating.…”
Section: Experimental Analysis Of the Effect Of The Proposed Attack On Recommendation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) We introduce a novel rating-based recommendation formulation algorithm that exploits the certainty aspect of rating predictions to generate more accurate and useful recommendations. Since the presented algorithm targets the recommendation formulation stage, for the assessment of the algorithm performance, we utilize pertinent metrics, and more specifically (i), the average rating value of the top-N recommended items, (ii) precision, and (iii) the normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG) [7][8][9][10][11]. (3) We analyze the additional computational and storage costs incurred in order to compute, store, and utilize the additional data needed by the proposed algorithm, demonstrating its feasibility and applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%