2015 IEEE 33rd VLSI Test Symposium (VTS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/vts.2015.7116270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the accuracy of defect diagnosis by considering reduced diagnostic information

Abstract: It was noted earlier that the accuracy of defect diagnosis may be improved if certain tests are removed from consideration by the defect diagnosis procedure. This paper observes that the effects, which support the removal of tests, also support the removal of observable outputs from consideration during defect diagnosis. Specifically, a test may create an output response that a defect diagnosis procedure will not be able to interpret correctly. This may affect some observable outputs more strongly than others.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yield analysis (YA) is performed to (a) accelerate yield ramp, (b) debug excursions, and (c) improve mature yield. Scan diagnosis is a useful tool in the YA framework [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], and currently it can be summarized into two categories: hardware/tester based methods [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] and software based methods [11] [12] [13] [14]. However, selecting representative units, which highlight either existing or new defect modes, for failure analysis (FA) is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yield analysis (YA) is performed to (a) accelerate yield ramp, (b) debug excursions, and (c) improve mature yield. Scan diagnosis is a useful tool in the YA framework [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], and currently it can be summarized into two categories: hardware/tester based methods [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] and software based methods [11] [12] [13] [14]. However, selecting representative units, which highlight either existing or new defect modes, for failure analysis (FA) is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%