2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Accuracy of Predicted Human Pharmacokinetics: Lessons Learned from the AstraZeneca Drug Pipeline Over Two Decades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both scaling of dose and model parameters produced human CSF exposure predictions within twofold of the exposure observed in patients with CLN2 disease. 16 , 17 The MAPE values across species were similar when scaling by dose and model parameters (21% and 28%, respectively), supporting the consistency and appropriateness of each approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Both scaling of dose and model parameters produced human CSF exposure predictions within twofold of the exposure observed in patients with CLN2 disease. 16 , 17 The MAPE values across species were similar when scaling by dose and model parameters (21% and 28%, respectively), supporting the consistency and appropriateness of each approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Certain pharmacokinetic features must be followed to consider the compound as a drug. Bioavailability of absorption, the volume of distribution, the half-life for ADMET were the essential pharmacokinetics features that play a vital role in discovering a drug candidate 24 . Pharmacokinetics properties of the four compounds described as molecular weight (Mw, g/mol), the logarithm of partition coefficient (log P), number of hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA), number of hydrogen bond donors (HBD), number of rotatable bonds (ROT), and topological polar surface area (TPSA, Å 2 ) were calculated by using SwissADME.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo PPB studies are not only performed for the parent drug, but also the main active metabolites [27] . In non‐separative methods, spectroscopic techniques can be employed, for example, UV‐Visible (UV‐Vis), fluorescence, infrared (IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), optical rotational dispersion (ORD), and circular dichroism (CD) [28] . In addition, calorimetric approaches are used to study drug‐protein interactions, for example, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) [26] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%