2023
DOI: 10.1080/14729679.2023.2196638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the analysis and reporting of studies of nature-based adventure interventions: a review of studies published in JAEOL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific to NRCTs is the possibility of systematic baseline difference between groups in variables that can predict the outcome of interest (i.e., prognostic variables). If groups differ in prognostic variables, such as baseline mean depression score, then differences in the outcome of interest might be explained by other factors than the intervention (Rosa et al, 2023). Studies without a comparison group are also constrained because it is not possible to estimate what would have occurred had the intervention group not received the intervention (Rosa et al, 2023).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specific to NRCTs is the possibility of systematic baseline difference between groups in variables that can predict the outcome of interest (i.e., prognostic variables). If groups differ in prognostic variables, such as baseline mean depression score, then differences in the outcome of interest might be explained by other factors than the intervention (Rosa et al, 2023). Studies without a comparison group are also constrained because it is not possible to estimate what would have occurred had the intervention group not received the intervention (Rosa et al, 2023).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If groups differ in prognostic variables, such as baseline mean depression score, then differences in the outcome of interest might be explained by other factors than the intervention (Rosa et al, 2023). Studies without a comparison group are also constrained because it is not possible to estimate what would have occurred had the intervention group not received the intervention (Rosa et al, 2023). For instance, observed changes in studies with only an intervention group might be explained by factors such as external events that occurred during the intervention period, placebo effect, regression to the mean, and random or systematic error in the measurement of the outcome (Rosa & Delabrida, 2021;Sterne, Hernán, et al, 2016;Thomas et al, 2020).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nature can contribute to addressing health and social challenges that societies across the globe currently face, including climate change, air pollution, heat stress, noise, low physical activity levels, mental health issues, the health of immigrant populations, and inequality or social exclusion related to urban demography (Hartig et al, 2014;Hordyk et al, 2015;Cohen-Shacham et al, 2016;Ten Brink et al, 2016;Bratman et al, 2019;Rosa et al, 2023a). For instance, human exposure to natural environments is associated with lower levels of stress (Thompson et al, 2012), fewer depressive symptoms (Reklaitiene et al, 2014), better perceived general and mental health (DeVries et al, 2013), children's cognitive development (Dadvand et al, 2015) and well-being (Brussoni et al, 2017), and lower risk of psychiatric disorders later in life (Engemann et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%