Improving the bond strength of polyacrylate cements to dentine. A rapid technique

Levine, Robert L.; Beech, D. R.; Garton, BJ

doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4803990

Cited by 28 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The solution was applied to the tooth surface for 30 s only according to the manufacturer's instructions. Levine, Beech & Garton (1977) maintained that citric acid treatment decreased the bond strength of ASPA with tooth surface. A significant decrease in the bond strength was also reported by Beech (1973) when he used 40% citric acid solution for a longer period.…”

Section: Number Of Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 90%

An evaluation of mechanical and adhesive properties of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements

Negm

Beech

Grant

1982

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mechanical and adhesive properties of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements were studied. Water had an adverse effect on the compressive and tensile strengths of both materials. Both cements showed good bonding to enamel and dentine. Bonds between polycarboxylate cement and sterling silver were strong enough to cause cohesive failure of the cement rather than adhesive failure, when the specimens were tested. Surface cleaning and conditioning with 5% sodium hypochlorite solution showed an improvement in the bonds of the cements to dentine and they were significantly stronger than the bonds formed after the use of 50% citric acid solution (ASPA conditioner.)

show abstract

Section: Number Of Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 90%

An evaluation of mechanical and adhesive properties of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements

Negm

Beech

Grant

1982

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hotz [136] recommended pre-treatment with citric acid. Levine et al [137] and Causton and Johnson [138] studied the use of mineralizing solutions. The use of citric acid was found unfavorable as, although it resulted in improved adhesion [136], it also opens up dentinal tubules and causes loss of the smear layer.…”

Section: Biocompatibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of poly(acrylic acid) in conventional glass polyalkenoate cements

Alhalawani

Curran

Boyd

et al. 2015

Journal of Polymer Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract Glass polyalkenoate cements (GPCs) have been used in dentistry for over 40 years. These novel bioactive materials are the result of a reaction between a finely ground glass (base) and a polymer (acid), usually poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), in the presence of water. This article reviews the types of PAA used as reagents (including how they vary by molar mass, molecular weight, concentration, polydispersity and content) and the way that they control the properties of the conventional GPCs (CGPCs) formulated from them. The article also considers the effect of PAA on the clinical performance of CGPCs, including biocompatibility, rheological and mechanical properties, adhesion, ion release, acid erosion and clinical durability. The review has critically evaluated the literature and clarified the role that the polyacid component of CGPCs plays in setting and maturation. This review will lead to an improved understanding of the chemistry and properties of the PAA phase which will lead to further innovation in the glass-based cements field.

show abstract

“…The dentine surfaces were prepared as follows for the cements according to the material tested and the directions: (a) untreated dentine; (b) dentine treated with 50% citric acid solution, for 30 s. This acid was included in the package of Caulk-ASPA Restorative; (c) treatment with a remineralizing solution prepared according to Levine et al (1977) for 3 min; (d) remineralizing solution for 3 min plus citric acid treatment for 30 s; (e) treatment with EDTA solution 17% (McComb & Smith, 1975;Lipton & Smith, 1977) for 60 s.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has previously been shown by Beech (1973) that if the calcium ion concentration of the surface of dentine is increased, the bond strength of polycarboxylate cements to dentine is also increased. Levine, Beech & Garton (1977), using a calcifying solution for 3 min on the dentine surface, found a 100% increase of the bond strength of Durelon and an increase in the bond strength of ASPA. Causton, Samara-Wickrama & Johnson (1976), using a different calcifying solution, found an increase of the bond strength of Durelon with dentine.…”

Section: "''"•:':-:''^ :''-•':-•'^-Y^--:-''•:^-y--:'••"-'••':-•••mentioning

confidence: 98%

Evaluation of the bonding of cervical restorative materials

Vougiouklakis

Smith

Lipton

1982

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Variable results have been reported for the bonding of cervical lesion restorative materials to enamel and dentine. The effect of surface condition on bond strength was studied for two glass ionomer and one polycarboxylate cements and one composite resin material.Flat surfaces of human enamel and dentine, prepared by wet grinding on 600 grit sihcon carbide paper, were treated respectively with water, phosphoric acid, citric acid, EDTA and/or remineralizing solution. Using an improved bonding device the cements and the composite resin were bonded to the prepared enamel and dentine surfaces. After 24 h in water at 37°C a tensile bond strength was determined. The bond fracture surfaces were examined in the scanning electron microscope. The results showed good bonding of the materials to enamel after the recommended surface treatments with cohesive failure and values 60-120 kg/cm^.Bonding to dentine was more variable and was critically dependent on surface preparation.Caulk-ASPA bond strengths that were obtained after various treatments ranged from 34 kg/cm^ (untreated dentine) to 54 kg/cm^ (citric acid treatment).Fuji ionomer bond strengths that were obtained after various treatments ranged from 42 kg/cm^ (citric acid treated dentine) to 56 kg/cm^ (FDTA treated).Durelon bond strengths that were obtained after various treatments ranged from 24 kg/cm^ (citric acid treated dentine), to 69 kg/cm^ (remineralizing solution treated dentine).The bond strengths that were obtained with Cervident after various treatments ranged from 0 kg/cm^ (untreated dentine) to 30 kg/cm^ (phosphoric acid treated dentine plus the adhesion promoter).SEM examination showed micromechanical bonding through penetration into dentinal tubules for all materials.

show abstract

Improving the bond strength of polyacrylate cements to dentine. A rapid technique

Cited by 28 publications

References 0 publications

An evaluation of mechanical and adhesive properties of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements

An evaluation of mechanical and adhesive properties of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements

The role of poly(acrylic acid) in conventional glass polyalkenoate cements

Evaluation of the bonding of cervical restorative materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About