2006
DOI: 10.1007/11880240_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Definition of UML

Abstract: The literature on formal semantics for UML is huge and growing rapidly. Most contributions open with a brief remark motivating the work, then quickly move on to the technical detail. How do we decide whether more rigorous semantics are needed? Do we currently have an adequate definition of the syntax? How do we evaluate proposals to improve the definition? We provide criteria by which these and other questions can be answered. The growing role of UML is examined. We compare formal language definition technique… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the authors of [13] give a recent overview of existing approaches and evaluate them using previously developed criteria. One of the most prominent approaches is the UML 2 Semantics Project [14] that develops mathematically formalized semantics for UML.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the authors of [13] give a recent overview of existing approaches and evaluate them using previously developed criteria. One of the most prominent approaches is the UML 2 Semantics Project [14] that develops mathematically formalized semantics for UML.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%