2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-018-0619-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the EFMs quality by augmenting their representativeness in LP methods

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough cellular metabolism has been widely studied, its fully comprehension is still a challenge. A main tool for this study is the analysis of meaningful pieces of knowledge called modes and, in particular, specially interesting classes of modes such as pathways and Elementary Flux Modes (EFMs). Its study often has to deal with issues such as the appearance of infeasibilities or the difficulty of finding representative enough sets of modes that are free of repetitions. Mode extraction methods usua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the end, as for any extraction method based on random sampling, it is usually recommended a statistic analysis of the solutions obtained in order to avoid any bias produced by that method (see, e.g. Hidalgo et al , 2018 ; Tabe-Bordbar and Marashi, 2013 ). Therefore, another interesting future work is to carry out that statistic analysis to check the diversity and quality of the EFMs found by EFM-Ta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the end, as for any extraction method based on random sampling, it is usually recommended a statistic analysis of the solutions obtained in order to avoid any bias produced by that method (see, e.g. Hidalgo et al , 2018 ; Tabe-Bordbar and Marashi, 2013 ). Therefore, another interesting future work is to carry out that statistic analysis to check the diversity and quality of the EFMs found by EFM-Ta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, even in the few cases in which the whole set E can be computed, it is pretty easy to obtain two subsets of EFMs that are quite different (see Hidalgo et al 2018 ), but it is much harder to elucidate which one is more representative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue has been previously observed (see Machado et al 2012 , Tabe-Bordbar and Marashi 2013 , Ullah et al 2020 ) and is a severe limitation that affects the usability of these methods. Note that different methods provide subsets that can be different in a statistically significant way ( Hidalgo et al 2018 ), so properties inferred from these EFMs may heavily depend on the method used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%