2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs6064647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Geolocation Algorithm for Sensors Onboard the ISS: Effect of Drift Angle

Abstract: Abstract:The drift angle caused by the Earth's self-rotation may introduce rotational displacement artifact on the geolocation results of imagery acquired by an Earth observing sensor onboard the International Space Station (ISS). If uncorrected, it would cause a gradual degradation of positional accuracy from the center towards the edges of an image. One correction method to account for the drift angle effect was developed. The drift angle was calculated from the ISS state vectors and positional information o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In intercalibration between hyperspectral sensors, sources of uncertainty include radiometric and spectral calibration uncertainties, the effects of differences in the spatial resolution, relative geolocation errors, and polarization sensitivity differences, among others. Specifically, the geometric accuracy of the products of the sensors on the ISS may be low compared with the accuracies of satellites flying at around 700 km, because the ISS experiences large variations in attitude and altitude [57]. The magnitudes of these effects on intercalibration should be investigated in a separate study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In intercalibration between hyperspectral sensors, sources of uncertainty include radiometric and spectral calibration uncertainties, the effects of differences in the spatial resolution, relative geolocation errors, and polarization sensitivity differences, among others. Specifically, the geometric accuracy of the products of the sensors on the ISS may be low compared with the accuracies of satellites flying at around 700 km, because the ISS experiences large variations in attitude and altitude [57]. The magnitudes of these effects on intercalibration should be investigated in a separate study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, changes in the center of mass caused by addition of modules and installation/removal of instruments, and frequent, though slow and steady, variations in both attitude and altitude of the ISS pose great challenges for georeferencing of the collected data. Attempting to mitigate this limimition, Dou et al (2013Dou et al ( , 2014 developed an algorithm for georeferencing the ISSAC imagery acquired onboard the ISS, which can be easily modified to suit other ISS sensors as well.…”
Section: Advantages and Limitations Of The Earth Observation From Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISSAC payload system was launched via the Japanese H-II Transfer Vehicle (HTV-2) to the ISS in January 2011 and was in operation from March 2011 to March 2013. The ISSAC optical system was radiometrically calibrated (Olsen et al, 2010), and a georeferencing algorithm was developed to compute geographic locations of its imagery (Dou et al, 2014(Dou et al, , 2013. The imagery acquired by ISSAC was available to the public free of charge through the Digital Northern Great Plains to help the farmers and ranchers in this region to practice precision agriculture.…”
Section: Past and Current Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GEDI footprint geolocations are derived from GEDI's own Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and star tracker sensors onboard the ISS [2], [4], [5]. However, the ISS's low orbit, size and shape result in increased mechanical vibrations and greater variations in orientation and altitude than traditional Earth Observation satellites [6]. Consequently, the horizontal position precision of GEDI footprints was expected at 10 m after calibration [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%