2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the impervious surface estimation with combined use of optical and SAR remote sensing images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
117
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
117
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A difficulty in distinguishing the aquatic and the inland vegetation was also observed. Texture features helped in this respect, as indicated by several previous studies [35,[56][57][58]. Crops were successfully separated from natural vegetation using shape features, which can be easily explained as the cultivated land has more regular patterns and shape than natural vegetation areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A difficulty in distinguishing the aquatic and the inland vegetation was also observed. Texture features helped in this respect, as indicated by several previous studies [35,[56][57][58]. Crops were successfully separated from natural vegetation using shape features, which can be easily explained as the cultivated land has more regular patterns and shape than natural vegetation areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…S1 data first had to split to the study site extend, de-burst the sub-swaths and apply the precise orbit file to offer the highest geometric precision. A Refined Lee 7 × 7 speckle filter was applied after suggestions [35] and the σ 0 outputs were terrain corrected using SNAP's "Range Doppler Terrain Correction" algorithm with the SRTM 1 arc-sec DEM. H-Alpha (H-a) decomposition [41] was included, allowing for entropy and alpha derivatives to be extracted from the data.…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous study, we analyzed the optimal setting of T and m by combining optical and SAR data. This study followed the recommendation that T should be bigger than 20 and m should be determined by Equation (5), where M is the total number of features for each sample [37]. In particular, RoF is different from RF in its technical details, although both of them construct a set of decision trees to form a forest with a certain process of randomness.…”
Section: Mangrove Species Classification Using Rotation Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration with other resolution optical remote sensing data with more optical band information, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data with information in the microwave band, and urban digital surface models (DSM) with height information have potential in urban land cover classification [49][50][51]. Integration with information from more optical bands, such as the near-infrared band, can produce powerful remote sensing indices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%