The success of translational research can ultimately be judged by the degree to which it reduces the incidence and prevalence of psychological, behavioral, and physical disorders and the major factors influencing them. In our view, we currently place insufficient emphasis on assessing our impact on the social determinants of disorders. As a result, we are failing to affect the incidence and prevalence of critical disorders. Moreover, translational research fails to take into account the full range of interventions that could significantly reduce the incidence and prevalence of our most pressing disorders. These include policy changes, media, and broad cultural change movements. In this paper, we discuss the momentous achievements the tobacco prevention movement made over the last half-century, describe how the lessons gleaned from this success can apply to other prevention efforts, and contrast this success with progress made in battling other major public health concerns. We call for an expansion of the translational research agenda to develop and evaluate broader and more comprehensive strategies to affect well-being in entire populations.
KeywordsContextual analysis, Translational research, Behavioral disorders, Cultural change, Policy, Social structureThe ultimate benefit of translational research will be that it improves human well-being. Specifically, translational research will be successful to the extent that it improves our ability to reduce the incidence and prevalence of psychological, behavioral, and physical disorders and the behavioral and environmental factors that contribute to these disorders.In this paper, we argue that the current thinking about translational research does not sufficiently consider the entire array of influences and interventions that are critical to producing significant reductions in the incidence and prevalence of our most pressing psychological, behavioral, and physical disorders. We believe that current research priorities place too little weight on the identification and experimental evaluation of contextual influences on key public health targets and too little emphasis on assessing our impact on the incidence and prevalence of these targets in entire populations. To explicate this concern, we consider evidence of progress on some major public health concerns and contrast these with progress in reducing cigarette smoking over the past 50 years.