1988
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.11.1436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the life-course development of socially disadvantaged mothers: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation.

Abstract: We evaluated a comprehensive program of prenatal and postpartum nurse home visitation for socially disadvantaged women bearing first children. Eighty-five per cent of the participating women were either teenagers (< 19 years at registration), unmarried, or of low socioeconomic status. Women were randomly assigned to either nurse home visitation or comparison services (free transportation for prenatal and well-child care and/or sensory and developmental screening for the child). During the first four years after Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
171
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
171
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next few years after the child's birth, mothers visited by nurses postponed subsequent pregnancies and had increased employment, less reliance on welfare, and were more often living with the child's father. [66][67][68] Mothers' parenting behaviour was generally improved as a result of the intervention, although not consistently across participants or conditions. In the Elmira study, home visits helped mothers reduce punishing or restrictive behaviour towards their infants, but only among those who were teenaged and unmarried, and had low income.…”
Section: Preventive Experiments For Dbdsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the next few years after the child's birth, mothers visited by nurses postponed subsequent pregnancies and had increased employment, less reliance on welfare, and were more often living with the child's father. [66][67][68] Mothers' parenting behaviour was generally improved as a result of the intervention, although not consistently across participants or conditions. In the Elmira study, home visits helped mothers reduce punishing or restrictive behaviour towards their infants, but only among those who were teenaged and unmarried, and had low income.…”
Section: Preventive Experiments For Dbdsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Langham et al 1996). Randomized trials provide limited evidence that both the social risk factors for the common mental disorders, and (in some cases) the prevalence of these conditions, may be reduced by interventions targeted at those who have experienced job loss and unemployment (Price et al 1992), marital separation (Bloom et al 1985), bereavement (Raphael, 1977 ;Vachon et al 1980) and teenage pregnancy in the context of poverty (Olds et al 1988). Another interesting study was a randomized trial of prioritization for re-housing on the grounds of (non-psychotic) mental ill health in Salford (Elton & Packer, 1986).…”
Section: Which Interventions ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poverty elevates a wide variety of risk factors that affect the development of virtually every one of the psychological, behavioral, and health outcomes we seek to affect [28][29][30]. There is some evidence that family interventions can produce small improvements in the family's economic well-being [31,32]. However, given that there is evidence from policy research of policies that can directly reduce family poverty and that increasing family income has preventive benefits [26] and, as we are far from being able to widely and effectively reach the entire populations of families, it would be imprudent to rely solely on program research to address this important problem.…”
Section: Practice and Public Health Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%