2005
DOI: 10.1021/ac0509859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Linearity of Infrared Diffuse Reflection Spectroscopy Data for Quantitative Analysis:  An Application in Quantifying Organophosphorus Contamination in Soil

Abstract: Diffuse reflection data are presented for ethyl methylphosphonate in a fine Utah dirt sample as a model system for organophosphate-contaminated soil. The data revealed a chemometric artifact when the spectra were represented in Kubelka-Munk units that manifests as a linear dependence of spectral peak height on variations in the observed baseline position (i.e., the position of the observed transmission intensity where no absorption features occur in the sample spectrum). We believe that this artifact is the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All spectra were plotted in absorbance units, thus avoiding baseline offset errors of the Kubelka−Munk transformation. (52) Vapor-phase water features were subtracted from the spectra using the OPUS atmospheric compensation function. The CO 2 mode centered at ∼2350 cm −1 was mathematically removed, a one point baseline offset was applied at ∼3900 cm −1 , and the Si−O−Si peak centered at ∼1150 cm −1 was normalized to an absorbance value of one to improve visualization.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All spectra were plotted in absorbance units, thus avoiding baseline offset errors of the Kubelka−Munk transformation. (52) Vapor-phase water features were subtracted from the spectra using the OPUS atmospheric compensation function. The CO 2 mode centered at ∼2350 cm −1 was mathematically removed, a one point baseline offset was applied at ∼3900 cm −1 , and the Si−O−Si peak centered at ∼1150 cm −1 was normalized to an absorbance value of one to improve visualization.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the absorbance [ Vogt and Finlayson‐Pitts , 1994; Ullerstam et al , 2002] and Kubelka‐Munk (K‐M) function [ Tsai and Kuo , 2006; Averett and Griffiths , 2006] integrated over the ( υ 3 ) region can be used to quantify the surface products. The K‐M method is known to vary with baseline position error that give rise to unacceptable uncertainty levels in quantitative experiments [ Samuels et al , 2006]. Hence the surface products of the SO 2 reactions on NaCl particles in this study were quantified using the integrated absorbance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the absorbance (Vogt and Finlayson-Pitts, 1994;Ullerstam et al, 2002) and Kubelka-Munk 5 (K-M) function (Averet and Griffiths, 2006;Tsai and Kuo, 2006) integrated can be used to quantify the surface products. The K-M method is known to vary with baseline position error that give rise to unacceptable uncertainty levels in quantitative experiments (Samuels et al, 2006). Hence, the surface products of the carboxylic acids react on Al 2 O 3 particles in this study were followed using the integrated absorbance-reaction 10 behavior.…”
Section: Interactive Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%