Improving the osseointegration and soft tissue sealing of zirconia ceramics by the incorporation of akermanite <i>via</i> sol infiltration for dental implants

Zhang, Wenmin; Fu, Wenhao; Wang, Xiaolan; Ye, Jiandong

doi:10.1039/d3tb00190c

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Characteristics such as surface roughness, surface energy, and the relationship of the material with the gingiva influence the state of the peri-implant mucosa and bacterial proliferation [ 37 ]. Many current studies present different systems for modifying the zirconium oxide surface to improve its biological properties [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. A smooth surface promotes good soft tissue sealing and less bacterial colonization [ 42 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biological Response of the Peri-Implant Mucosa to Different Definitive Implant Rehabilitation Materials

Baus-Domínguez,

Oliva-Ferrusola,

Maza-Solano

et al. 2024

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Sealing the peri-implant tissue is a determining factor for long-term implant survival. In the transmucosal region, the cervical fraction of the prosthetic crown is in contact with these tissues, so mucointegration will also be influenced by the biomaterial used for the prosthetic restoration. This study aims to compare the tissue response generated by definitive restorative materials and polymeric materials from a histological point of view. Methods: This study performed an observational prospective cohort study in which biopsies of the peri-implant mucosa were taken after placement of implant-supported prosthetic restorations made of different materials (zirconium oxide, lithium disilicate, and PMMA). Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in the increase in the thickness of the non-keratinized epithelium when comparing the definitive materials (zirconium oxide/lithium disilicate) vs. the provisional material (PMMA) and in the number of collagen fibers when comparing zirconium oxide and lithium disilicate. Conclusions: This study found that zirconia is the material that presents the most adequate biological response of peri-implant tissues. It shows a lower intensity of inflammatory cellular content, a total normality in the number of collagen fibers (the arrangement of the fibers is normal in 90% of the cases), and vascular proliferation of connective tissue in 83% of the cases. These parameters make it a material with a predictable response. Similarly, only the following slight statistically significant differences between the definitive and provisional materials are observed, indicating that the biological response generated by the provisional material (PMMA) is not very different from that obtained with the placement of the definitive restoration.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biological Response of the Peri-Implant Mucosa to Different Definitive Implant Rehabilitation Materials

Baus-Domínguez,

Oliva-Ferrusola,

Maza-Solano

et al. 2024

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Surface modification strategies to reinforce the soft tissue seal at transmucosal region of dental implants

Jin,

Yu,

Zhang

et al. 2024

Bioactive Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nanoscale osseointegration of zirconia evaluated from the interfacial structure between ceria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia and cell-induced hydroxyapatite

Saito,

Onuma,

Yamakoshi

2024

Journal of Oral Biosciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Improving the osseointegration and soft tissue sealing of zirconia ceramics by the incorporation of akermanite via sol infiltration for dental implants

Abstract: Zirconia ceramics is a promising dental implant material due to their high-grade biocompatibility, high mechanical strength, and distinctive aesthetic appearance. Nevertheless, zirconia ceramic is a bio-inertness material with lack of...

Cited by 6 publications

References 49 publications

Biological Response of the Peri-Implant Mucosa to Different Definitive Implant Rehabilitation Materials

Biological Response of the Peri-Implant Mucosa to Different Definitive Implant Rehabilitation Materials

Surface modification strategies to reinforce the soft tissue seal at transmucosal region of dental implants

Nanoscale osseointegration of zirconia evaluated from the interfacial structure between ceria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia and cell-induced hydroxyapatite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About