2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2019.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the performance of a multi-junction solar cell by optimizing BSF, base and emitter layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the thickness of the absorber layer increased further, the series resistance of the cell rises at a low concentration below 10 15 cm −3 , causing the drop of FF to ∼75%. It was observed from figure 2(d) that the power conversion efficiency (PCE) exhibited a slight increase with increasing thickness, followed by a subsequent decline at a thickness of 1 μm [35]. Thus, the maximum efficiency η over 30% was achieved with V OC of 1.1 V, J SC of 31.06 mA cm −2 , and FF of 87.28% at a MoSe 2 absorber thickness of approximately 1.0 μm and doping concentration of 10 16 cm −3 with BSF layer (figure 2(d)).…”
Section: Effect Of Mose 2 Absorber Layer Thickness and Doping Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the thickness of the absorber layer increased further, the series resistance of the cell rises at a low concentration below 10 15 cm −3 , causing the drop of FF to ∼75%. It was observed from figure 2(d) that the power conversion efficiency (PCE) exhibited a slight increase with increasing thickness, followed by a subsequent decline at a thickness of 1 μm [35]. Thus, the maximum efficiency η over 30% was achieved with V OC of 1.1 V, J SC of 31.06 mA cm −2 , and FF of 87.28% at a MoSe 2 absorber thickness of approximately 1.0 μm and doping concentration of 10 16 cm −3 with BSF layer (figure 2(d)).…”
Section: Effect Of Mose 2 Absorber Layer Thickness and Doping Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why the best choice is to build a tunnel intersection with a high impurity concentration [20]. The temperature has a great effect on the performance of the cell if the tunnel junction has lower doping [21], [22], and [23]. Increasing the bandgap of the junction will improve the performance of the cell [24].…”
Section: Tunnel Junction (Gaas) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, tremendous progress has been made in incorporating the perovskite material as the absorber layer in solar cells, and the performance efficiency has improved to 26.1% in 2022. The popular perovskite light absorber materials such as formamidinium lead iodide (FAPbI 3 ) and methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI 3 ) contain toxic lead and hence are not environmentally and biologically compatible when employed in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) as light absorbing materials. It has been proved experimentally that the highest achieved efficiency for PSCs corresponds to the device with the MA + cation containing perovskite as the absorber material . The inherent volatile nature of the perovskites with the organic MA + cation affects the efficiency and the performance of the perovskite solar cells with the MA + cation containing perovskite as the absorber material .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%