2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.89.032809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the performance of algorithms to find communities in networks

Abstract: Most algorithms to detect communities in networks typically work without any information on the cluster structure to be found, as one has no a priori knowledge of it, in general. Not surprisingly, knowing some features of the unknown partition could help its identification, yielding an improvement of the performance of the method. Here we show that, if the number of clusters were known beforehand, standard methods, like modularity optimization, would considerably gain in accuracy, mitigating the severe resolut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting future problem is to extend the reluctant backtracking approach to reliably detect more than two communities. Determining the number of communities in a network is a problem by itself and knowing the number of communities in a network can improve the performance of community detection methods 26 . Krzakala et al 20 suggested a heuristic to determine the number of communities in a given network when using the non-backtracking matrix B .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An interesting future problem is to extend the reluctant backtracking approach to reliably detect more than two communities. Determining the number of communities in a network is a problem by itself and knowing the number of communities in a network can improve the performance of community detection methods 26 . Krzakala et al 20 suggested a heuristic to determine the number of communities in a given network when using the non-backtracking matrix B .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the approximations involved, the heuristic can fail for real 20 and simulated networks 26 , by predicting too many real-valued eigenvalues outside the bulk and thus predicting too many modules. The optimisation of modularity Q by the second eigenvector of both the flow F and normalised reluctant-backtracker P matrices suggests two further solutions for finding more than two communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we offer an alternative to this problem by using an effective heuristic. We first use an assistant community detection method, such as the spectral method 28 suggested by Darst et al 42 , or the widely used though often criticised modularity optimization method 29 to determine an approximate number of communities c s . Thereafter, we decrease k starting from c s until ρ k < ρ k + 1 and set c d = k + 1, and then increase k starting from c s until ρ k < ρ k − 1 and set c u = k − 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitness function f s can measure the internal and external tightness for a local community. In topology detecting community methods, it has shown a good performance, and was expanded or applied by more researchers [23,24]. Inspired by this thought, we propose the fitness function for a hyperedge e to be given as…”
Section: Similarity For Hyperedge Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%