2020
DOI: 10.1103/prxquantum.1.020304
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Performance of Deep Quantum Optimization Algorithms with Continuous Gate Sets

Abstract: Variational quantum algorithms are believed to be promising for solving computationally hard problems on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) systems. Gaining computational power from these algorithms critically relies on the mitigation of errors during their execution, which for coherence-limited operations is achievable by reducing the gate count. Here, we demonstrate an improvement of up to a factor of 3 in algorithmic performance for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) as measured by t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the near term, quantum computers will most likely only run low-depth QAOA. Low-depth QAOA results are improved by robust control [41] and by mapping β and γ to parameters of the control pulses [42,43], a method available to cloud-based quantum computers [44] with pulse-level control [45,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the near term, quantum computers will most likely only run low-depth QAOA. Low-depth QAOA results are improved by robust control [41] and by mapping β and γ to parameters of the control pulses [42,43], a method available to cloud-based quantum computers [44] with pulse-level control [45,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems considered include MaxCut [15], [35], [36], Maximum-k-Cut [17], Maximum Independent Set [37], [38], Community Detection [5], [39], [40], Graph Vertex k-Coloring [41], Maximum k-Colorable Subgraph [42], Graph Partitioning [8], and many more [43]- [45]. The combination of hardness and sparsity make graph problems especially appealing as an early application of QAOA, as evidenced by the fact that a number of recent experimental demonstrations apply QAOA to graph problems [4], [46]. For problems defined explicitly on unweighted graphs, the group of automorphisms of the graph is a subgroup of the group of symmetries of the problem.…”
Section: Accelerating Qaoa Training By Using Fast Graph Automorphism Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10, we show the comparison in the performance of our minimal encoding scheme and the QAOA protocol for multiple randomly generated A matrices of size n c = 8. This is in contrast to problems artificially curated to match the topology of the quantum device commonly used in experimental implementations [21,26,36,37,49]. Similar to the simulations shown in Appendix C, we use a noise model that, in addition to the finite gate fidelity, also includes thermal relaxations and readout errors.…”
Section: Encoding)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize that the search protocol in both the QAOA and minimal encoding scheme have been performed in presence of the simulated noise. This is also in contrast to some recent experimental QAOA demonstrations where the optimization is first performed with an ideal simulation and only the optimized circuit is executed on the quantum hardware [21,26,49]. For the minimal encoding, we used 15 starting points of randomly chosen parameters.…”
Section: Encoding)mentioning
confidence: 99%