ForewordNational performance measurement systems exist across nearly all health systems in the OECD. Some focus on the efficiency or productivity of health care services, while others help improve the management of health care services or inform decisions regarding the resource allocation. This article looks at the use of performance measurement systems in the health sector across OECD and partner countries, focusing on the extent to which they affect budgeting and spending decisions.The results show that the majority of OECD countries rely on performance measurement systems established at the central level that, in most cases, monitor the performance of providers of hospital and outpatient care. Systems vary markedly among countries, although some cross-country trends exist, including a focus on improving performance rather than cutting costs measures.
Executive summaryPerformance measurement systems in the health sector are used to collect data to monitor, analyse and manage health services. What governments wish to achieve will differ across countries, influencing the design and impact of these systems. Systems may also reflect the institutional arrangements of health systems, such as the level of decentralisation and the organisation of different levels of care.Given that central governments are best placed to monitor the whole population, most performance measurement systems in the OECD are established and administered at the national level. This centralisation can help define the responsibilities for the overall coordination of measurement systems, ensuring a consistent approach for cross-country analysis. Systems usually monitor the performance of hospitals and providers of outpatient services, rather than providers of preventative care, or providers of medical goods. They also tend to cover multiple categories of providers, rather than only a part of the health system. The decision to establishing performance measurement systems is often driven by a wish to improve the quality of service delivery and monitor compliance with national standards. Performance measurement systems are less likely to be designed to meet objectives around cost-cutting or improving budget control.The use of performance information in the health sector can have a variety of consequences. For service providers and subnational authorities, the public dissemination of performance results may lead to improved health outcomes, as providers aim to improve practices in response to poor results. Moreover, public dissemination adds an element of competition among providers, pushing them to improve standards to avoid being labelled as the worst performing.Given that central governments often ensure the efficiently and equitably delivery ofhealth services,. they can use performance measurement systems to monitor subnational governments, such as regions or states, to ensure compliance with national standards. In addition, performance measurement systems have allowed countries to innovate in how they pay health care providers. By using performa...