[Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1992
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1992.225970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the performance of the 16 kb/s LD-CELP speech coder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a couple of reasons for that but the main reason can be explained by postfiltering. The postfilters of the current standards are generally tuned for a single encoding; thus the amount of filtering becomes excessive in tandem conditions, resulting in distorted speech [7]. 4 shows a block diagram of the proposed LSP domain method.…”
Section: A Lsp Mapping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a couple of reasons for that but the main reason can be explained by postfiltering. The postfilters of the current standards are generally tuned for a single encoding; thus the amount of filtering becomes excessive in tandem conditions, resulting in distorted speech [7]. 4 shows a block diagram of the proposed LSP domain method.…”
Section: A Lsp Mapping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple solution to operate the different speech coding standards together is using a cross tandeming (or transcoding) method: generate a speech signal by using a decoder from one standard and then re-encode the signal with the other standard [6], [7]. From this point on, this approach is referred to as a conventional cross tandeming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of speech synthesized in this manner is often judged as unnatural due to incorrect voicing decisions, poor spectral resolution, and oversimplified excitation functions (Wong, 1980;Kahn and Garst, 1983). A number of approaches have been taken to improve the excitation waveform for LP by modeling the residue or the glottal waveform characteristics (Bergstrom and Hedelin, 1989;Caspers and Atal, 1987;Chen et al, 1992;Childers and Wu, 1990;Dankberg and Wong, 1979;Griffin and Lim, 1988;Haagen et al, 1992;Hedelin, 1986Hedelin, , 1988Kang and Everett, 1985 can further improve LP synthesis, since early work showed that the glottal pulse shape was important for synthesizing natural sounding vowels (Rosenberg, 1971;Holmes, 1973). Furthermore, recent research has shown that characteristics of the glottal source waveform, such as the glottal pulse width, glottal pulse skewness, the abruptness of glottal closure, and a turbulence noise component (Childers and Lee, 1991), are important both for speech synthesis and for modeling voice types and vocal disorders (Carlson et al, 1991;Childers and Ahn, 1994;Childers et al, 1989b;Wu, 1990, 1991;Childers and Lee, 1991;Childers and Wong, 1994;Fant, 1993;Fant et al, 1985;Fant and Lin, 1988;Fujisaki and Ljungqvist, 1986;Klatt and Klatt, 1990; Karlsson, 1986Karlsson, , 1988Karlsson, , 1990Karlsson, , 1991Karlsson, , 1992Milenkovic, 1993;Pinto et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%