2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Physical Realism and Structural Accuracy of Protein Models by a Two-Step Atomic-Level Energy Minimization

Abstract: Most protein structural prediction algorithms assemble structures as reduced models that represent amino acids by a reduced number of atoms to speed up the conformational search. Building accurate full-atom models from these reduced models is a necessary step toward a detailed function analysis. However, it is difficult to ensure that the atomic models retain the desired global topology while maintaining a sound local atomic geometry because the reduced models often have unphysical local distortions. To addres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
640
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 937 publications
(650 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
640
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest free energy conformations were determined by SPICKER (a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds; Zhang and Skolnick, 2004). Refinement of the low free energy conformations was done by using FG-MD (Fragment Guided Molecular Dynamics simulations; Zhang et al, 2011) and ModRefiner (Xu and Zhang, 2011). Prediction of the ligand-binding site of the target protein was made by COACH algorithm (Yang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Myoglobin Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest free energy conformations were determined by SPICKER (a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds; Zhang and Skolnick, 2004). Refinement of the low free energy conformations was done by using FG-MD (Fragment Guided Molecular Dynamics simulations; Zhang et al, 2011) and ModRefiner (Xu and Zhang, 2011). Prediction of the ligand-binding site of the target protein was made by COACH algorithm (Yang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Myoglobin Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ramachandran plot displays the main chain conformation angles (Phi and Psi) of the polypeptide chain of a protein molecule. One predicted model with the highest score was selected as the structural model of beta-barrel domain of AbOmpA and then energy minimization refinements were performed at Modrefiner online tool (a high-resolution protein structure refinement web server [19]). The refined model was validated by PorSA web server (an interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins [20]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three dimensional (3D) model for CCT5 protein ( Figure 3) was generated by Phyre2 server and the model refinement and energy minimization was done by ModRefiner program that utilizes an algorithm for atomic level to develop and refine protein structures, critically based on a two-step, atomic-level energy minimization [22]. Ramachandran plot of model as illustrated in Figure 4 was analyzed by RAMPAGE server and overall G factor from PROCHECK.…”
Section: Determination Of Cct5 Tertiary Structurementioning
confidence: 99%