2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
313
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(321 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
4
313
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For rigorous data collection in our study, we followed the four classical Delphi characteristics: (1) iteration, (2) anonymity, (3) controlled feedback, and (4) statistical summary of group feedback (Landeta et al 2011; Belton et al 2019). Following the approach presented by Kisgen (2017), the first step in the data collection process was to select a suitable real‐time (RT) Delphi software tool (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rigorous data collection in our study, we followed the four classical Delphi characteristics: (1) iteration, (2) anonymity, (3) controlled feedback, and (4) statistical summary of group feedback (Landeta et al 2011; Belton et al 2019). Following the approach presented by Kisgen (2017), the first step in the data collection process was to select a suitable real‐time (RT) Delphi software tool (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used an online, four-round Delphi study methodology, ideal for integrating the perspectives of multiple stakeholders ( Hasson et al, 2000 ), with feedback managed by a moderator at all stages ( Trevelyan & Robinson, 2015 ). The Delphi study methodology was selected as it has been proposed to be more effective for group-based judgement and decision-making than traditional group meetings by both increasing a group’s access to multiple interpretations and views and decreasing the negative features of group discussions such as domineering individuals and opinions ( Belton et al, 2019 ; Hasson et al, 2000 ; Rowe & Wright, 2001 ; see also Humphrey-Murto & de Wit, 2019 ). The Delphi methodology was therefore chosen as an ideal format for systematically capturing and integrating opinion from a diverse group of experts, who were not co-located and remained anonymous from each other ( Goodman, 1987 ; Hsu & Sandford, 2007 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 4, the specific operation of the Delphi method can be based on the following steps of the flow chart, and feedback should be given at least three times in the feedback phase, generally three to five times [38], until the experts reach a consensus.…”
Section: Delphi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%