2018
DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.18.12.01.pne570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the prediction of potato productivity: APSIM-Potato model parameterization and evaluation in Tasmania, Australia

Abstract: Crop growth models are required to be extensively evaluated against actual data from field grown plants in order to have confidence in their prediction of crop productivity under various management options or a future changed climate. We evaluated the ability of the APSIM-potato model to predict production, phenology, and N-uptake of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under Tasmanian conditions. On-farm monitoring plots were established in north-west Tasmania within four different well-managed potato fields grown d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation models forecast crop productivity by combining crop growth information including the physiological characteristics of plants, nutrient cycling, and environmental factors [ 19 ]. Over the past few decades, several simulation models have been developed for potato, such as POMOD [ 20 ], AQUACROP [ 21 ], APSIM-Potato [ 22 ], PotatoSoilWat [ 23 ], and LINTUL-Potato [ 24 ]. Although powerful, they typically require extensive crop-specific data as inputs, such as crop variety, management, and soil conditions, which are often difficult to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation models forecast crop productivity by combining crop growth information including the physiological characteristics of plants, nutrient cycling, and environmental factors [ 19 ]. Over the past few decades, several simulation models have been developed for potato, such as POMOD [ 20 ], AQUACROP [ 21 ], APSIM-Potato [ 22 ], PotatoSoilWat [ 23 ], and LINTUL-Potato [ 24 ]. Although powerful, they typically require extensive crop-specific data as inputs, such as crop variety, management, and soil conditions, which are often difficult to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide range of potato crop growth models in the literature such as SUBSTOR-Potato, LINTUL-Potato, SOLANUM, APSIMPotato, SPUDSIM, POMOD, SIMPOTATO or Potato Calculator [33][34][35]. However, most of these models have not been comprehensively tested to real field data and some have never even been used in a real application [36]. Their main limitations are the cost of obtaining the necessary input data required to run the models, the lack of spatial information in some instances, and the quality of the input data [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the RUE values under optimal conditions are likely to be even higher than the mean values observed in this study. Given the central role of RUE in many crop growth models (Griffin et al, 1993;Borus et al, 2018), a correct quantification of RUE and how it is affected by temperatures is essential for accurate crop growth simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%