2018
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.14083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the prescribing of palivizumab

Abstract: Palivizumab is often prescribed without meeting recognised best practice guidelines, and patients eligible are frequently not prescribed palivizumab. The streamlined IPU, implemented in hospital A, excluded patients who did not meet guidelines. The pro forma needs further refinement, and complementary strategies introduced to improve compliance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We present here real-world data on the use of palivizumab in a high-risk cohort of infants in Western Australia. More than 90 % of infants receiving palivizumab had at least one high-risk condition for palivizumab use; a study conducted in New South Wales reported only 67.5% of infants administered palivizumab met their local hospital guidelines [20]. We also found that gestational age < 28 weeks, CHD and being born after 2010…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…We present here real-world data on the use of palivizumab in a high-risk cohort of infants in Western Australia. More than 90 % of infants receiving palivizumab had at least one high-risk condition for palivizumab use; a study conducted in New South Wales reported only 67.5% of infants administered palivizumab met their local hospital guidelines [20]. We also found that gestational age < 28 weeks, CHD and being born after 2010…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The F protein is therefore less shielded compared to the G protein and constitutes a more suitable therapeutic target [43]. A concern regarding the increased use of palivizumab is the emergence of antibody-resistant viruses [45]. Clinical isolates with N262D, K272E/M/Q and S275F/L substitutions in the palivizumab-binding site (antigenic site II, amino acids 258–275) exhibited resistance to neutralization by palivizumab [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,24 In our study, no child received palivizumab prophylaxis. This finding is not unexpected; low prescribing has been described in this setting 25 and is likely related to high cost, unclear cost-effectiveness, a lack of Australian guidelines, and the requirement for monthly intramuscular injections. 21,[25][26][27][28] Single-dose mAb and RSV vaccines are in active development 27,29,30 and might play a role in the prevention of RSV-attributable deaths in the future; however, the evidence for this will need to be established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%