2012
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.656332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the push–pull strategy in a serial supply chain by a hybrid push–pull control with multiple pulling points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The following articles also focus on supply risk mitigation but do not fall into the aforementioned subcategories, such as evaluation and selection of the optimal disruption management strategy (Tomlin, 2006;Yang et al, 2009;Colicchia et al, 2010;Schmitt, 2011), determination of the optimal inventory level or policies (Schmitt et al, 2010;Glock and Ries, 2013;Son and Orchard, 2013), investigation of how managers mitigate global sourcing risks (Christopher et al, 2011;Vedel and Ellegaard, 2013), risk and quality control of a supplier (Tapiero, 2007), allocation of supplier development investments among multiple suppliers (Talluri et al, 2010), analysis of the impact of strategic information acquisition and sharing on supply risk mitigation (Wakolbinger and Cruz, 2011), examination of the effectiveness of hybrid push-pull strategy for supply risk mitigation (Kim et al, 2012), and exploration of actions to proactively mitigate supplier insolvency risk (Grötsch et al, 2013).…”
Section: Supply Risk Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following articles also focus on supply risk mitigation but do not fall into the aforementioned subcategories, such as evaluation and selection of the optimal disruption management strategy (Tomlin, 2006;Yang et al, 2009;Colicchia et al, 2010;Schmitt, 2011), determination of the optimal inventory level or policies (Schmitt et al, 2010;Glock and Ries, 2013;Son and Orchard, 2013), investigation of how managers mitigate global sourcing risks (Christopher et al, 2011;Vedel and Ellegaard, 2013), risk and quality control of a supplier (Tapiero, 2007), allocation of supplier development investments among multiple suppliers (Talluri et al, 2010), analysis of the impact of strategic information acquisition and sharing on supply risk mitigation (Wakolbinger and Cruz, 2011), examination of the effectiveness of hybrid push-pull strategy for supply risk mitigation (Kim et al, 2012), and exploration of actions to proactively mitigate supplier insolvency risk (Grötsch et al, 2013).…”
Section: Supply Risk Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors would like to acknowledge the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments, and the financial support received by one of the authors from the Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Melbourne. 1 Tomlin (2006), Chopra et al (2007), He and Zhang (2008), Tang and Tomlin (2008), Chen and Yano (2010), Iakovou et al (2010), Wang et al (2011), Gümüş et al (2012), Xanthopoulos et al (2012) Kaya and Özer (2009), Meena et al (2011), Schmitt (2011), Qiang and Nagurney (2012), Radke and Tseng (2012) Cruz et al (2006), Cruz (2009), Raghavan and Mishra (2011), Kang and Kim (2012), Kim et al (2012, Hishamuddin et al (2013), Kumar and Tiwari (2013), Sarmah (2013) Sodhi (2005), Keren (2009), Sodhi and Tang (2009), Mak and Shen (2012) Snyder et al (2007), Lejeune (2008), Sawik (2013a) , Yang et al (2009) Georgiadis et al 2011 Analytical: , Smaros et al (2003), , Cachon (2004), , Betts and Johnston (2005), Sodhi (2005), Brun et al (2006), Kumar et al (2006), Talluri et al (2006), Bogataj and Bogataj (2007), Chan and Kumar (2007), Wu et al (2007), Blackhurst et al (2008), Kull and Closs (2008), Kull and Talluri (2008), …”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid push-pull strategy that incorporates additional stock points after the push-pull boundary as the pulling points in a serial supply chain was presented in Kim (2012). This strategy can mitigate the risks and improve the robustness of the push-pull strategy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second group of questions included the questions about customer satisfaction, (Mohd Suki, 2013). The third group of questions included user experience (Kim, Fowler, Shunk, & Pfund, 2012;Mishra, Dash, & Cyr, 2014;Wilska, 2003;Sweeney & Soutar, 2001;Netemeyer et al, 2004), and the fourth group of questions included brand and product quality as well as promotion on the mobile device market (Zhang & Luo, 2016;Chen & Ann, 2016). In the next section of this paper, the research results will be presented.…”
Section: Methodology and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%