2008
DOI: 10.1080/13678860701782311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the quality of evaluation participation: a meta-evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, the evaluation plan must be feasible and realistic.The evaluation plan must be accepted by everyone involved in the evaluation, from participants to managers. If the agents do not accept the proposed plan it will be a failure – participation in evaluation is a guarantee for success (Russ‐Eft and Preskill, 2008). Therefore, it is better to design a simple evaluation plan agreed upon by all rather than a complex plan that does not receive support from the organisation.Ensure that training is the main cause of the results obtained, and isolate the possible effects of other factors in the organisation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Strategies To Improve the Evaluation Of Training In Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the evaluation plan must be feasible and realistic.The evaluation plan must be accepted by everyone involved in the evaluation, from participants to managers. If the agents do not accept the proposed plan it will be a failure – participation in evaluation is a guarantee for success (Russ‐Eft and Preskill, 2008). Therefore, it is better to design a simple evaluation plan agreed upon by all rather than a complex plan that does not receive support from the organisation.Ensure that training is the main cause of the results obtained, and isolate the possible effects of other factors in the organisation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Strategies To Improve the Evaluation Of Training In Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To inform the broader audiences about their insights and findings, HRD scholars who conduct evaluation research may often opt for a case-study format to publish their research. An illustrative example is Russ-Eft and Preskill’s (2008) publication describing a meta-evaluation (an evaluation of evaluation) that identified solutions to the participation problem in their project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, such meta-evaluation can bring greater clarity and greater credibility to the original evaluation findings. Russ-Eft and Preskill (2008) provide an example of a meta-evaluation of a beta-test process within a private organization. Even though meta-evaluations can yield important learnings and findings, the challenge for evaluators is to identify ways to build such meta-evaluations into an already expensive (potentially in the minds of the client) process.…”
Section: Future Directions and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%