Improving the quality of health information: a qualitative assessment of data management and reporting systems in Botswana

Abstract

BackgroundEnsuring that data collected through national health information systems are of sufficient quality for meaningful interpretation is a challenge in many resource-limited countries. An assessment was conducted to identify strengths and weaknesses of the health data management and reporting systems that capture and transfer routine monitoring and evaluation (M&E) data in Botswana.MethodsThis was a descriptive, qualitative assessment. In-depth interviews were conducted at the national (n = 27), district (n = 31), and facility/community (n = 71) levels to assess i) M&E structures, functions, and capabilities; ii) indicator definitions and reporting guidelines; iii) data collection forms and tools; iv) data management processes; and v) links with the national reporting system. A framework analysis was conducted using ATLAS.ti v6.1.ResultsHealth programs generally had standardized data collection and reporting tools and defined personnel for M&E responsibilities at the national and district levels. Best practices unique to individual health programs were identified and included a variety of relatively low-resource initiatives such as attention to staffing patterns, making health data more accessible for evidence-based decision-making, developing a single source of information related to indicator definitions, data collection tools, and management processes, and utilization of supportive supervision visits to districts and facilities. Weakness included limited ownership of M&E-related duties within facilities, a lack of tertiary training programs to build M&E skills, few standard practices related to confidentiality and document storage, limited dissemination of indicator definitions, and limited functionality of electronic data management systems.ConclusionsAddressing fundamental M&E system issues, further standardization of M&E practices, and increasing health services management responsiveness to time-sensitive information are critical to sustain progress related to health service delivery in Botswana. In addition to high-resource initiatives, such as investments in electronic medical record systems and tertiary training programs, there are a variety of low-resource initiatives, such as regular data quality checks, that can strengthen national health information systems. Applying best practices that are effective within one health program to data management and reporting systems of other programs is a practical approach for strengthening health informatics and improving data quality.

A Framework for Quality Management of University Educational Information: A Review Study

“…Other resources have also highlighted accuracy. 8,14,15,18,24,26,29,39 DQ improvement is vital, which was noted in previous literature. 8,19,41 "DQ should be monitored, evaluated and reported. "…”

“…28 DQ is a complex construct which includes multiple dimensions: accuracy, reliability, precision, completeness, timeliness, integrity, and confidentiality. 29 …”

E-Sakto: Lowering the Cardiovascular Risk of Patients with Hypertension and Diabetes Through Public–Private Partnership

“…Clinics in Canada believed that their perceived time savings and improved patient record-keeping had improved the quality of proactive and preventive care and patient safety by providing more complete and legible information. The common message that emerged was that no clinic would return to paper-based charts after experiencing the benefits of EMR [7]- [9]. In 2014, the Philippines launched the eHealth and significantly improve healthcare service among Service Delivery Networks (SDN) [10].…”

Understanding wetlands reclamation and soil-transmitted helminths and schistosomiasis incidence patterns in Rwanda (2001-2012)

“…Reliable and accurate routine health data recorded at primary health care facility can provide strategic information for more effective monitoring and evaluation systems in NTD programs in resource-constrained settings (Ledikwe et al, 2014;Mate, Bennett, Mphatswe, Barker, & Rollins, 2009). That is in line with a shared commitment to efforts to combat NTDs initiated by WHO since 2007(WHO, 2012.…”

“…Since then, the improvement of data management, data validity and reliability for informed health care planning and decision making through well-structured and operating health management and information systems (HMIS) have been the preoccupation of the health sector and their global partners in all sub-Saharan countries. Nowadays routine health data reporting systems at the district level have been strengthened in most African countries, such as Uganda (Kiberu et al, 2014), Botswana (Ledikwe et al, 2014), Tanzania, Ghana, Mozambique, and Zambia (Mutale et al, 2013). Likewise, an East Africa Policy Forum on health management information systems with support from DFID Health Resource Centre has been initiated ten years ago (DFID/HRC, 2006).…”