2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the reliability of bulk sediment radiocarbon dating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean 95% confidence over the entire core was 874 years 100% of the dates overlap with the age-depth model (95% ranges). It is possible that the bulk-sediment radiocarbon dates are older by multiple centuries or even millennia than recorded due to reworking of old organic material (Strunk et al, 2020). However, based on the linear alignment of dated samples until the time of sampling, we can assume neglectable effects from the presence of old carbon in the samples.…”
Section: Chronology and Sedimentation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean 95% confidence over the entire core was 874 years 100% of the dates overlap with the age-depth model (95% ranges). It is possible that the bulk-sediment radiocarbon dates are older by multiple centuries or even millennia than recorded due to reworking of old organic material (Strunk et al, 2020). However, based on the linear alignment of dated samples until the time of sampling, we can assume neglectable effects from the presence of old carbon in the samples.…”
Section: Chronology and Sedimentation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is vital that roots or rootlets are removed to prevent contamination through the intrusion of younger carbon from overlying sediments. If terrestrial macrofossils cannot be identified, the humin or humic fraction from bulk peat/sediment samples is measured instead, though these fractions may be more vulnerable to contamination (Walker et al 2012;Strunk et al 2020). If bulk peat/sediment is analyzed, care is taken to remove any roots prior to chemical pretreatment.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a number of regional records across Arctic Siberia are becoming increasingly prevalent (Biskaborn et al, 2012;Diekmann et al, 2016;Melles et al, 2012;Subetto et al, 2017), studies have often neglected reconstructions of accumulation rates. This is largely due to limited agecontrols related to problematic radiocarbon dating of organic poor systems that often lack dateable macrofossil remains and possess low dating resolutions (Lozhkin et al 2016, Strunk et al, 2020. Current eastern Siberian 60 research has primarily focussed on the reconstruction of Holocene accumulation rates of carbon using sediment cores derived from thermokarst lake systems (Anthony et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%