2022
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the reproducibility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy brain thermometry: Theoretical and empirical approaches

Abstract: In proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS)‐based thermometry of brain, averaging temperatures measured from more than one reference peak offers several advantages, including improving the reproducibility (i.e., precision) of the measurement. This paper proposes theoretically and empirically optimal weighting factors to improve the weighted average of temperatures measured from three references. We first proposed concepts of equivalent noise and equivalent signal‐to‐noise ratio in terms of frequency mea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon stabilization at each temperature, shimming was conducted to correct for temperature‐related susceptibility changes, 26,32 followed by a proton Point‐RESolved Spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence with the following parameters: TE = 40 ms, TR = 2500 ms, flip angle = 90°, averages = 150, voxel size = 3 × 3 × 3 mm 3 , acquisition bandwidth = 6010 Hz, and acquisition time = 375 s. Proton MR spectroscopic thermometry was used because it noninvasively measures temperature based on frequency differences between temperature‐dependent water and temperature‐independent metabolites. The three frequencies of the N ‐acetyl‐aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), and choline (Ch) singlets at 2.01, 3.03, and 3.19 ppm were assumed to be temperature independent and fixed, and were used as references to improve the reproducibility of the temperature measurement 58 . Upon completion of the acquisitions, the data were exported to TopSpin 4.2 software (Bruker), where the frequency difference between water and the metabolites was reconstructed and the average temperature was computed according to 58 TNAAgoodbreak=315.6goodbreak−103.8()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δNAA TCrgoodbreak=206.7goodbreak−101.7()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δCr TChgoodbreak=193.4271goodbreak−106.08()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δCh Tavggoodbreak=()TNAAgoodbreak+TCrgoodbreak+TCh/3, where δH2O,δCr,δCh, and δNAA are the frequencies of the water, Cr, Ch, and NAA peaks, respectively, in units of ppm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Upon stabilization at each temperature, shimming was conducted to correct for temperature‐related susceptibility changes, 26,32 followed by a proton Point‐RESolved Spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence with the following parameters: TE = 40 ms, TR = 2500 ms, flip angle = 90°, averages = 150, voxel size = 3 × 3 × 3 mm 3 , acquisition bandwidth = 6010 Hz, and acquisition time = 375 s. Proton MR spectroscopic thermometry was used because it noninvasively measures temperature based on frequency differences between temperature‐dependent water and temperature‐independent metabolites. The three frequencies of the N ‐acetyl‐aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), and choline (Ch) singlets at 2.01, 3.03, and 3.19 ppm were assumed to be temperature independent and fixed, and were used as references to improve the reproducibility of the temperature measurement 58 . Upon completion of the acquisitions, the data were exported to TopSpin 4.2 software (Bruker), where the frequency difference between water and the metabolites was reconstructed and the average temperature was computed according to 58 TNAAgoodbreak=315.6goodbreak−103.8()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δNAA TCrgoodbreak=206.7goodbreak−101.7()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δCr TChgoodbreak=193.4271goodbreak−106.08()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δCh Tavggoodbreak=()TNAAgoodbreak+TCrgoodbreak+TCh/3, where δH2O,δCr,δCh, and δNAA are the frequencies of the water, Cr, Ch, and NAA peaks, respectively, in units of ppm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three frequencies of the N ‐acetyl‐aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), and choline (Ch) singlets at 2.01, 3.03, and 3.19 ppm were assumed to be temperature independent and fixed, and were used as references to improve the reproducibility of the temperature measurement 58 . Upon completion of the acquisitions, the data were exported to TopSpin 4.2 software (Bruker), where the frequency difference between water and the metabolites was reconstructed and the average temperature was computed according to 58 TNAAgoodbreak=315.6goodbreak−103.8()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δNAA TCrgoodbreak=206.7goodbreak−101.7()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δCr TChgoodbreak=193.4271goodbreak−106.08()δH2normalOgoodbreak−δCh Tavggoodbreak=()TNAAgoodbreak+TCrgoodbreak+TCh/3, where δH2O,δCr,δCh, and δNAA are the frequencies of the water, Cr, Ch, and NAA peaks, respectively, in units of ppm. Peak frequencies were identified by recording the frequency at the maximum of the peak magnitude.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation