2022
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2022.3201827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Response Speed of an Active-Current Controlled Field Emitter Arrays by Modifying the Controlled Current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is found that the response time of CNT can be down to ~100 ns [19,20], while that for individual SiC nanowire is ~1 ms [21]. For ZnO nanowire, the response time is tens of microseconds in a MOSFET controlled device [22]. Here, it should be noted that the plasma-induced electron emission [23][24][25] is not considered since it requires a pulsed voltage of more than 10 4 V, which is difficult to apply in a gated structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found that the response time of CNT can be down to ~100 ns [19,20], while that for individual SiC nanowire is ~1 ms [21]. For ZnO nanowire, the response time is tens of microseconds in a MOSFET controlled device [22]. Here, it should be noted that the plasma-induced electron emission [23][24][25] is not considered since it requires a pulsed voltage of more than 10 4 V, which is difficult to apply in a gated structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%