2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1117296108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the scientific foundations for estimating health risks from the Fukushima incident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On May 12, 2011, the Japanese government ordered Fukushima Prefecture to euthanize the cattle in the evacuation zone. Recently, Calabrese indicated the importance of risk assessment for chronic radiocesium exposure based on the situation at Fukushima in Japan and emphasized the limitation for the assessment of risk from radiocesium intake due to the absence of animal model chronic bioassays [6]. Almost all of the cattle abandoned in the evacuation zone can be recognized individually by their ear-tag and their individual histories are easily obtainable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On May 12, 2011, the Japanese government ordered Fukushima Prefecture to euthanize the cattle in the evacuation zone. Recently, Calabrese indicated the importance of risk assessment for chronic radiocesium exposure based on the situation at Fukushima in Japan and emphasized the limitation for the assessment of risk from radiocesium intake due to the absence of animal model chronic bioassays [6]. Almost all of the cattle abandoned in the evacuation zone can be recognized individually by their ear-tag and their individual histories are easily obtainable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,27,28 The LNT model assumes that each radionuclide disintegration has the same probability of causing cell transformation and that each transformed cell has the same probability of developing into a cancer. The LNT model has been employed extensively in the radiation safety and prevention communities, [27][28][29][30] yet some studies have questioned its validity at low doses [31][32][33][34][35] resulting in an ongoing debate.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposition occurred in an individual radionuclide and in an organ-specific manner, and radioactive caesium (Cs) was detected in all the organs examined13. Discharge of 134 Cs and 137 Cs that emit γ- and β-rays is of primary concern, because they were released in a large amount and have a long half-life14. Thus, significant questions regarding the effect of long-term exposure to radioactive Cs on human health are now being raised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%