2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39850-9_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Use of Strategies in Computer-Supported Collaborative Processes

Abstract: Abstract. The members of a work group need to apply a common strategy to collaboratively solve a problem. A good strategy will mainly depend on the collaboration scenario, participants' background, and available tools. This paper presents two widgets that have been useful to help to define and use good group members' strategies in collaborative learning scenarios. The concepts behind these widgets can be reused to support strategy definition processes in order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Adhoc groups need it. The most important theme is to have a common element: to define an appropriate strategy, commitment and a common goal, as is presented by Collazos et al [15].…”
Section: Obtained Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, Adhoc groups need it. The most important theme is to have a common element: to define an appropriate strategy, commitment and a common goal, as is presented by Collazos et al [15].…”
Section: Obtained Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In previous works (Collazos, Guerrero, Pino, & Ochoa, 2003b), the group which obtained the best result was formed by students from the same school who were used to working together; they knew each other, so it is not surprising that they had implicit strategies for working in a group. Therefore, their performance was better than that of the other participant groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst several mechanisms that can be found in the scientific literature to characterise cooperation and collaboration (see, for example, Daradoumis, Martínez-Monés, & Xhafa, 2006;Duque, Bravo, & Ortega, 2011;Gaßner, Jansen, Harrer, Herrmann, & Hoppe, 2003), we have chosen the indicators proposed by Collazos et al (2003b), considering the following metrics: strategy definition, coordination activities, success criteria review, monitoring and performance. We have chosen these indicators because the metrics proposed are easily mapped to the information recorded in the logs of the system.…”
Section: Experimental Setting and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important issue is count on a common element to defme an appropriate strategy, commitment and a common goal [7].…”
Section: Results Of the Second Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%