1997
DOI: 10.1080/10106049709354573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving thematic mapper based classification of wildfire induced vegetation mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, sub-canopy surface burn (underburn) is practically undetectable in satellite imagery when upper-canopy foliar matter is unaltered by fire (Caetano et al, 1994;Medler and Yool, 1997). Authors have typically assigned the classification label of 'light burn' to areas where only ground fuels have been fire-altered, while canopy crowns remain unaltered (White et al, 1996;Fung and Jim, 1998).…”
Section: Challenges In Detecting Burn Severitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Third, sub-canopy surface burn (underburn) is practically undetectable in satellite imagery when upper-canopy foliar matter is unaltered by fire (Caetano et al, 1994;Medler and Yool, 1997). Authors have typically assigned the classification label of 'light burn' to areas where only ground fuels have been fire-altered, while canopy crowns remain unaltered (White et al, 1996;Fung and Jim, 1998).…”
Section: Challenges In Detecting Burn Severitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The strength of the KT transform is that the coeYcients of brightness, greenness and especially wetness appear associated with 'minority' burned area scene characteristics (Patterson and Yool 1998). Medler and Yool (1997) combined composite terrain and TM imagery in a supervised classi cation to map wild re mortality. Error matrices demonstrate d this combination of satellite and ancillary data provided a 40% improvement in accuracy compared to TM data alone.…”
Section: Moderate Spatial Resolution Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historic fire regimes are often studied using dendrochronological techniques to date fire scars (Batek et al, 1999;Heyerdahl et al, 2001;González, 2005;Guyette et al, 2006) and infer fire return interval, fire size and frequency. Current fire regime is often studied by using remote sensing techniques (Mollicone et al, 2002) based on vegetation succession stages and spatial patterns of burnt areas to infer fire return intervals and to map fire intensity (White et al, 1996;Melder and Yool, 1997;Rollins et al, 2004). However, these research approaches were limited in spatial extents and time scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%