2018
DOI: 10.3390/jimaging4110128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Tomographic Reconstruction from Limited Data Using Mixed-Scale Dense Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: In many applications of tomography, the acquired data are limited in one or more ways due to unavoidable experimental constraints. In such cases, popular direct reconstruction algorithms tend to produce inaccurate images, and more accurate iterative algorithms often have prohibitively high computational costs. Using machine learning to improve the image quality of direct algorithms is a recently proposed alternative, for which promising results have been shown. However, previous attempts have focused on using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the network has shown good results for removing noise and other artifacts from tomographic images when a large training set of similar objects scanned at high dose is available. This is described in [34], where the network was applied to tomographic images reconstructed from a dataset of parallel beam projections, rather than cone beam projections.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the network has shown good results for removing noise and other artifacts from tomographic images when a large training set of similar objects scanned at high dose is available. This is described in [34], where the network was applied to tomographic images reconstructed from a dataset of parallel beam projections, rather than cone beam projections.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modeled the Bessel beam as a constant line segment for computational simplicity, but models of the actual point spread function could be used for computing the inverse Radon transform. Approaches combining imaging physics and machine learning have been successfully applied in other tomography techniques for improving the reconstruction from sparse, shallow angle projections [13,[16][17][18][19][20]. Our networks were limited by GPU memory and therefore only low resolution images (128 pixel resolution instead of 512) were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volume information is obtained from four independent projections recorded from four different angles using temporally multiplexed, tilted Bessel beams in a single frame scan. For volume reconstruction we combine inverse Radon transforms adapted for Bessel beam scanning with machine learning [13,[16][17][18][19][20]. Machine learning has been shown for example in optical phase imaging to allow high resolution reconstruction from sparse projections at shallow angles similar to the ones used here [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TomoGAN outperforms FBPConvNet on PSNR (higher median and smaller variance means more stable performance) but has a worse SSIM score. However, when we examine an arbitrarily chosen denoised image as shown in Figure 18, we see that FBPConvNet introduces low-contrast artifacts as marked in Figure 18(a) (there are visibly more white dots in Figure 18(a) than in Figure 18(d)), likely because: (1) FBPConvNet only used MSE loss and those artifacts were not significant to the MSE, and/or (2) as observed by the FBPConvNet authors [15], FBPConvNet has a high risk of overfitting. But these artifacts are significant to TomoGAN's adversarial loss and perceptual loss.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Solutions On Experimental Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They achieved a 10-fold increase in signal-to-noise ratio, enabling the reliable tracing of brain structures in low-dose datasets. For (iii), Pelt et al [15] trained a mixed-scale dense convolutional neural network [16] in a supervised fashion to learn a mapping from low-dose to normal-dose reconstructions. They achieved impressive results on simulation datasets; but unfortunately the performance of proposed model is not thoroughly evaluated on different experimental datasets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%