2014
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2014.922702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving transient performance of adaptive control architectures using frequency-limited system error dynamics

Abstract: We develop an adaptive control architecture to achieve stabilization and command following of uncertain dynamical systems with improved transient performance. Our framework consists of a new reference system and an adaptive controller. The proposed reference system captures a desired closed-loop dynamical system behavior modified by a mismatch term representing the high-frequency content between the uncertain dynamical system and this reference system, i.e., the system error. In particular, this mismatch term … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These benefits are made possible by our new global strict barrier Lyapunov functions that were not present in the work of Mazenc et al and that contain a new coupling of state components and unknown parameters. These new Lyapunov function constructions (rather than trajectory tracking mechanisms for the systems in this work, which were reported by Yucelen et al in the special case of time‐invariant systems) are the focus of this work. Unlike in the work of Mazenc et al the unknown parameters in our dynamics enter nonlinearly (through products of entries of unknown weight and control effectiveness matrices) which also puts our work outside the scope of works such as that of Mazenc et al Also, we do not restrict the dimensions of the systems, so our work can cover higher‐order systems; see Section 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These benefits are made possible by our new global strict barrier Lyapunov functions that were not present in the work of Mazenc et al and that contain a new coupling of state components and unknown parameters. These new Lyapunov function constructions (rather than trajectory tracking mechanisms for the systems in this work, which were reported by Yucelen et al in the special case of time‐invariant systems) are the focus of this work. Unlike in the work of Mazenc et al the unknown parameters in our dynamics enter nonlinearly (through products of entries of unknown weight and control effectiveness matrices) which also puts our work outside the scope of works such as that of Mazenc et al Also, we do not restrict the dimensions of the systems, so our work can cover higher‐order systems; see Section 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition to the preceding benefits, the systems in this work are motivated by frequency‐limited model reference adaptive control methods from the work of Yucelen et al, which improved on basic adaptive control by ensuring better transient performance. However, while Yucelen et al used nonstrict Lyapunov functions and so did not ensure parameter convergence, here, we combine barrier Lyapunov functions with a different class of update laws from those in the work of Yucelen et al to overcome the obstacles that prevented from being applicable to model reference adaptive control with unknown weight matrices. We use penalty terms in our update laws, and known intervals containing the unknown parameter component values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second example, the proposed controller has been compared with MMAC 5 and the MRAC proposed in the work of Yucelen et al 20 It is important to note that the plant considered in the work of Narendra and Balakrishnan 5 did not satisfy the assumptions A1 and A3 in Section 2. In the first example, the proposed controller has been compared with the standard MRAC.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…

In this paper, a resetting mechanism is proposed to enhance the transient performance of model reference adaptive control. [18][19][20][21] In the work of Yucelen and Haddad, 18 an adaptive controller has been proposed in which the transient and steady-state bounds in terms of L 1 -norms of the error dynamic are obtained. Whenever the transient specification is not satisfying, there is a jump in the controller parameters.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the controller adapts feedback gains to suppress this error using the information received from the update law. From a practical standpoint, the output (resp., state) of the uncertain dynamical system can be far different from the output (resp., state) of the reference model during transient time (learning phase) and this difference can lead to poor transient performance, although a model reference adaptive control scheme can guarantee that this system error vanishes asymptotically 3,4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%