2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2008.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvised layout of keypad entry system for mobile phones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus we cannot simply assume that initial stage data can be a good estimator for ultimate speed. 2 Third, there is the issue of statistical stability. In [8], we reported a classical comparison of ABC and PM layouts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus we cannot simply assume that initial stage data can be a good estimator for ultimate speed. 2 Third, there is the issue of statistical stability. In [8], we reported a classical comparison of ABC and PM layouts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have used this approach to analyze initial acceptance of new designs, and were able to conclude that it was acceptable even if it was significantly slower than the control. The method has been used for evaluating a pen-based computer [1] and a mobile phone keypad [2]. It satisfies criteria 3 and 4, but ignores 1 and 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several variations within the Pinyin method that are introduced by different mobile companies [7]. Similar, thoughts to restructure the keypad layout is seen even for English, where Mittal et al propose a layout based on the frequency of use of alphabet [10].…”
Section: Entering Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the improvement is obvious in the text entry method, the models are specific for the Arabic text environment. Mittal and Sengupta (2009) repositioned alphabets on the 3×4 keyboard to reduce the number of matches for any possible numeric combinations. Their model groups commonly used key combinations together and requires less tapping for commonly used alphabets.…”
Section: Background and Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%