2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective

Abstract: Though human beings embody a unique ability for planned behavior, they also often act impulsively. This insight may be important for the study of self-control situations in which people are torn between their long-term goals to restrain behavior and their immediate impulses that promise hedonic fulfillment. In the present article, we outline a dual-systems perspective of impulse and self-control and suggest a framework for the prediction of self-control outcomes. This framework combines three elements that, co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

45
1,076
4
29

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,164 publications
(1,154 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(180 reference statements)
45
1,076
4
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the functional integration of negative affect and cognitive control, it is noticeable that our view deviates from established views that hot, emotional processes have an antagonistic relationship with colder cognition (Baumeister & Heatherton, 1996;Heatherton & Wagner, 2011;Hofmann, Friese, & Strack, 2009;Iordan, Dolcos, & Dolcos, 2013;Kahneman, 2011;Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999). From this, the obvious question arises: How can different models of control provide such opposing roles for affect?…”
Section: Anxiety Acceptance and Improving Cognitive Controlmentioning
confidence: 38%
“…Considering the functional integration of negative affect and cognitive control, it is noticeable that our view deviates from established views that hot, emotional processes have an antagonistic relationship with colder cognition (Baumeister & Heatherton, 1996;Heatherton & Wagner, 2011;Hofmann, Friese, & Strack, 2009;Iordan, Dolcos, & Dolcos, 2013;Kahneman, 2011;Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999). From this, the obvious question arises: How can different models of control provide such opposing roles for affect?…”
Section: Anxiety Acceptance and Improving Cognitive Controlmentioning
confidence: 38%
“…Psychology as a discipline has focused mostly on factors that affect the ability of reasoned conclusions to control passionate ones (Hofmann, Friese, & Strack, 2009 ). For example, children's ability to forgo a small, immediate reward in favor of a larger, delayed reward has been shown to depend on various factors, including opportunity to pay attention to the immediate reward and thinking happy or sad thoughts (Mischel, Ebbesen, & Raskoff, 1972 ).…”
Section: Theories Of Impulsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability to inhibit, override, or to otherwise circumvent responses that are motivated by short-term rewards at the expense of long-term benefits is commonly referred to as self-control (Casey 2015;Fujita 2011;Hofmann et al 2009;Mischel et al 1989;Reynolds and McCrea 2016;Vohs and Heatherton 2000). Despite such a capacity for self-regulation, there are numerous examples in everyday life in which self-control fails.…”
Section: Self-control and Ego Depletionmentioning
confidence: 99%