2018
DOI: 10.1037/amp0000387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology.

Abstract: Impulsiveness has been studied as an aspect of personality and psychopathology for generations. There are longstanding disagreements about how to define it and whether it should be viewed as one construct or several. This article begins by briefly reviewing some earlier and some more recent work on impulsiveness. Several approaches have recently converged to focus on a distinction between impulsive reactions to emotion and impulsive properties that are not initiated by emotion. From this review we turn to psyc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
67
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(196 reference statements)
10
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…DD also appeared to be a distinct genetic factor. Our findings also support the hypothesis that although internalizing psychopathology is positively associated with all impulsivity facets except sensation seeking, this genetic association is most pronounced for IPTs related to the control over negative emotions (Carver & Johnson, 2018). This work demonstrates that large-scale GWAS results can be used to evaluate theoretical models of impulsivity and psychology more broadly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DD also appeared to be a distinct genetic factor. Our findings also support the hypothesis that although internalizing psychopathology is positively associated with all impulsivity facets except sensation seeking, this genetic association is most pronounced for IPTs related to the control over negative emotions (Carver & Johnson, 2018). This work demonstrates that large-scale GWAS results can be used to evaluate theoretical models of impulsivity and psychology more broadly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, our findings confirmed the hypothesis that positive and negative urgency, which are related to emotional control, are more strongly genetically correlated to internalizing psychopathology compared to other IPTs (Carver & Johnson, 2018;Johnson et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Genetic Structure Of Impulsivity 18supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In support of Rachman's theory, impairments in emotional processing and emotional regulation have been linked to a wide range of mental health conditions in adults, including anxiety and panic disorders (Baker, 2007a, Folk et al, 2014, post traumatic stress disorder (Kumpala, 2011, Rachman, 2001, Woodward et al,, 2018, Weiss et al, 2013, obsessive compulsive disorders (Kang, 2012), eating disorders (Bydlowski, 2005), psychosis & persecutory delusions (Baslet, 2008 ;Westermann & Lincoln, 2011), deliberate self-harm (Gratz & Tull, 2010; identity disorders and borderline personality disorder (Kaufman, 2015;Bilbo, 2010, ); attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders (Mitchell et al, 2012) substance abuse (Dvorak et al, 2014), depression (Honkalampi, 2000, Joormann, 2010, eating disorders (Lavenderet al, 2014;Racine & Wildes, 2013;Smith et al, 2019), psychopathic personality characteristics (Donahue et al, 2014), internalizing and externalizing disorders (Berke et al, 2018;Carver & Johnson, 2018;Naragon-Gainey et al, 2018;Hofmann et al, 2012), in psoriasis (Almeida et al, 2017), pain (ElbĂšze & Gay 2012;Esteves et al, 2013) and medical conditions (Blumenau 2012), Although Rachman's theory focuses on the outcomes of successful or unsuccessful processing, it does not specify the psychological mechanisms that might be involved in the processing itself. Baker developed an expanded emotional processing model which specified psychological mechanisms by which the emotional processing of stressful events might be facilitated or impeded, described in 2007, 2010, and 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the neurocognitive level, negative urgency is most closely linked to impaired response inhibition, implicating the second and third stages of inhibitory control in the expression of this trait. Despite this link, performance on the majority of behavioral and neuropsychological tasks measuring impulsivity are poorly or only modestly associated with negative urgency and other self-reported impulsive traits [48][49][50][51]. Accumulating evidence nuances our understanding of this relationship, suggesting that negative urgency may be more strongly tied to emotional response inhibition, particularly the ability to inhibit motor impulses driven by negative affect [52][53][54][55][56].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%